» Articles » PMID: 28222117

Two Dynamic Regimes in the Human Gut Microbiome

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Feb 22
PMID 28222117
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The gut microbiome is a dynamic system that changes with host development, health, behavior, diet, and microbe-microbe interactions. Prior work on gut microbial time series has largely focused on autoregressive models (e.g. Lotka-Volterra). However, we show that most of the variance in microbial time series is non-autoregressive. In addition, we show how community state-clustering is flawed when it comes to characterizing within-host dynamics and that more continuous methods are required. Most organisms exhibited stable, mean-reverting behavior suggestive of fixed carrying capacities and abundant taxa were largely shared across individuals. This mean-reverting behavior allowed us to apply sparse vector autoregression (sVAR)-a multivariate method developed for econometrics-to model the autoregressive component of gut community dynamics. We find a strong phylogenetic signal in the non-autoregressive co-variance from our sVAR model residuals, which suggests niche filtering. We show how changes in diet are also non-autoregressive and that Operational Taxonomic Units strongly correlated with dietary variables have much less of an autoregressive component to their variance, which suggests that diet is a major driver of microbial dynamics. Autoregressive variance appears to be driven by multi-day recovery from frequent facultative anaerobe blooms, which may be driven by fluctuations in luminal redox. Overall, we identify two dynamic regimes within the human gut microbiota: one likely driven by external environmental fluctuations, and the other by internal processes.

Citing Articles

Microbial functional guilds respond cohesively to rapidly fluctuating environments.

Crocker K, Skwara A, Kannan R, Murugan A, Kuehn S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39974892 PMC: 11838272. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.30.635766.


Warming-driven migration of enterotypes mediates host health and disease statuses in ectotherm Litopenaeus vannamei.

Zeng S, Huang Z, Kriengkrai S, Zhou R, Yuan D, Tun N Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):126.

PMID: 39865129 PMC: 11770195. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07558-2.


Distinct dynamic phases observed in bacterial microcosms.

Aparicio A, Liu Y Eng Microbiol. 2024; 3(1):100063.

PMID: 39628518 PMC: 11611004. DOI: 10.1016/j.engmic.2022.100063.


Interpolation of microbiome composition in longitudinal data sets.

Peleg O, Borenstein E mBio. 2024; 15(9):e0115024.

PMID: 39162569 PMC: 11389371. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01150-24.


Microbiome time series data reveal predictable patterns of change.

Karwowska Z, Szczerbiak P, Kosciolek T Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(10):e0410923.

PMID: 39162505 PMC: 11448390. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04109-23.


References
1.
Ding T, Schloss P . Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body. Nature. 2014; 509(7500):357-60. PMC: 4139711. DOI: 10.1038/nature13178. View

2.
Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende D . Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011; 473(7346):174-80. PMC: 3728647. DOI: 10.1038/nature09944. View

3.
Franzosa E, Huang K, Meadow J, Gevers D, Lemon K, Bohannan B . Identifying personal microbiomes using metagenomic codes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(22):E2930-8. PMC: 4460507. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423854112. View

4.
David L, Materna A, Friedman J, Campos-Baptista M, Blackburn M, Perrotta A . Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(7):R89. PMC: 4405912. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-7-r89. View

5.
Yatsunenko T, Rey F, Manary M, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello M, Contreras M . Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012; 486(7402):222-7. PMC: 3376388. DOI: 10.1038/nature11053. View