» Articles » PMID: 27730384

Sound Source Localization and Segregation with Internally Coupled Ears: the Treefrog Model

Overview
Journal Biol Cybern
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2016 Oct 13
PMID 27730384
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acoustic signaling plays key roles in mediating many of the reproductive and social behaviors of anurans (frogs and toads). Moreover, acoustic signaling often occurs at night, in structurally complex habitats, such as densely vegetated ponds, and in dense breeding choruses characterized by high levels of background noise and acoustic clutter. Fundamental to anuran behavior is the ability of the auditory system to determine accurately the location from where sounds originate in space (sound source localization) and to assign specific sounds in the complex acoustic milieu of a chorus to their correct sources (sound source segregation). Here, we review anatomical, biophysical, neurophysiological, and behavioral studies aimed at identifying how the internally coupled ears of frogs contribute to sound source localization and segregation. Our review focuses on treefrogs in the genus Hyla, as they are the most thoroughly studied frogs in terms of sound source localization and segregation. They also represent promising model systems for future work aimed at understanding better how internally coupled ears contribute to sound source localization and segregation. We conclude our review by enumerating directions for future research on these animals that will require the collaborative efforts of biologists, physicists, and roboticists.

Citing Articles

Bone conduction pathways confer directional cues to salamanders.

Capshaw G, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Soares D, Carr C J Exp Biol. 2021; 224(20.

PMID: 34581406 PMC: 8601709. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.243325.


Acoustic ranging in poison frogs-it is not about signal amplitude alone.

Ringler M, Szipl G, Hodl W, Khil L, Kofler B, Lonauer M Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017; 71(8):114.

PMID: 28757679 PMC: 5506510. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2340-2.


How spatial release from masking may fail to function in a highly directional auditory system.

Lee N, Mason A Elife. 2017; 6.

PMID: 28425912 PMC: 5443663. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.20731.


Frogs Exploit Statistical Regularities in Noisy Acoustic Scenes to Solve Cocktail-Party-like Problems.

Lee N, Ward J, Velez A, Micheyl C, Bee M Curr Biol. 2017; 27(5):743-750.

PMID: 28238657 PMC: 5340627. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.031.


Schema vs. primitive perceptual grouping: the relative weighting of sequential vs. spatial cues during an auditory grouping task in frogs.

Farris H, Ryan M J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2017; 203(3):175-182.

PMID: 28197725 PMC: 10084916. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-017-1149-9.


References
1.
Zhang H, Xu J, Feng A . Effects of GABA-mediated inhibition on direction-dependent frequency tuning in the frog inferior colliculus. J Comp Physiol A. 1999; 184(1):85-98. DOI: 10.1007/s003590050308. View

2.
Feng A, Capranica R . Sound localization in anurans. I. Evidence of binaural interaction in dorsal medullary nucleus of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). J Neurophysiol. 1976; 39(4):871-81. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.4.871. View

3.
Lin W, Feng A . Free-field unmasking response characteristics of frog auditory nerve fibers: comparison with the responses of midbrain auditory neurons. J Comp Physiol A. 2002; 187(9):699-712. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-001-0241-2. View

4.
Farris H, Rand A, Ryan M . The effects of spatially separated call components on phonotaxis in túngara frogs: evidence for auditory grouping. Brain Behav Evol. 2002; 60(3):181-8. DOI: 10.1159/000065937. View

5.
Narins P, Hodl W, Grabul D . Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(2):577-80. PMC: 141038. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0237165100. View