» Articles » PMID: 15480704

AM Representation in Green Treefrog Auditory Nerve Fibers: Neuroethological Implications for Pattern Recognition and Sound Localization

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2004 Oct 14
PMID 15480704
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In addition to spectral call components, temporal patterns in the advertisement-call envelope of green treefrog males ( Hyla cinerea) provide important cues for female mate choice. Rapid amplitude modulation (AM) with rates of 250-300 Hz is typical for this species' advertisement calls. Here we report data on the encoding of these rapid call modulations by studying the responses of single auditory nerve fibers to two-tone stimuli with envelope periodicities close to those of the natural call. The free-field response properties of 86 nerve fibers were studied from 32 anesthetized males. The accuracy of stimulus envelope coding was quantified using both a Gaussian function fit to the interspike interval histograms derived from the first seven 20-ms stimulus segments, and the vector-strength metric applied to the phase-locked responses. Often, AM encoding in the initial stimulus segment was more faithful than that in its second half. This result may explain why conspecific females prefer calls in which the initial segment is unmasked rather than masked. Both the questions of pattern recognition and localization are discussed, and the data are related to behavioral observations of female choice and localization performance in this species.

Citing Articles

Nonlinear processing of a multicomponent communication signal by combination-sensitive neurons in the anuran inferior colliculus.

Lee N, Schrode K, Bee M J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2017; 203(9):749-772.

PMID: 28748486 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-017-1195-3.


Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Bee M, Christensen-Dalsgaard J Biol Cybern. 2016; 110(4-5):271-290.

PMID: 27730384 PMC: 5107320. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-016-0695-5.


Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Hall I, Woolley S, Kwong-Brown U, Kelley D J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015; 202(1):17-34.

PMID: 26572136 PMC: 4699871. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-1049-9.


Hearing conspecific vocal signals alters peripheral auditory sensitivity.

Gall M, Wilczynski W Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1808):20150749.

PMID: 25972471 PMC: 4455818. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0749.


Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Schrode K, Bee M J Exp Biol. 2015; 218(Pt 6):837-48.

PMID: 25617467 PMC: 4376190. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.115014.


References
1.
van Stokkum I . Modelling the response of auditory midbrain neurons in the grassfrog to temporally structured monaural stimuli. Hear Res. 1990; 43(2-3):231-50. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90231-d. View

2.
Ronken D . Basic properties of auditory-nerve responses from a "simple' ear: the basilar papilla of the frog. Hear Res. 1990; 47(1-2):63-82. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90167-n. View

3.
Michelsen A, Jorgensen M, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Capranica R . Directional hearing of awake, unrestrained treefrogs. Naturwissenschaften. 1986; 73(11):682-3. DOI: 10.1007/BF00366697. View

4.
Rose G, Capranica R . Sensitivity to amplitude modulated sounds in the anuran auditory nervous system. J Neurophysiol. 1985; 53(2):446-65. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.2.446. View

5.
Fay R . Coding of information in single auditory-nerve fibers of the goldfish. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978; 63(1):136-46. DOI: 10.1121/1.381705. View