Free-field Unmasking Response Characteristics of Frog Auditory Nerve Fibers: Comparison with the Responses of Midbrain Auditory Neurons
Overview
Physiology
Social Sciences
Affiliations
Previous studies in the inferior colliculus have shown that spatial separation of signal and noise sources improves signal detection. In this study, we investigated the free-field unmasking response properties of single fibers in the auditory nerve--these were compared to those of inferior colliculus neurons under the same experimental conditions to test the hypothesis that central processing confers advantages for signal detection in the presence of spatially separated noise. For each neuron, we determined the detection threshold for a probe at the unit's best azimuth under three conditions: (1) by itself, (2) when a masker at a constant level was also presented at the unit's best azimuth, and (3) when the masker was positioned at different azimuths. We found that, on average, maskers presented at a unit's best azimuth elevated the probe detection threshold by 4.22 dB in the auditory nerve and 10.97 dB in the inferior colliculus. Angular separation of probe and masker sources systematically reduced the masking effect. The maximum masking release was on average 2.90 dB for auditory nerve fibers and 9.40 dB for inferior colliculus units. These results support the working hypothesis, suggesting that central processing contributes to the stronger free-field unmasking in the inferior colliculus.
Auditory sensitivity exhibits sexual dimorphism and seasonal plasticity in music frogs.
Yang P, Xue F, Cui J, Brauth S, Tang Y, Fang G J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2018; 204(12):1029-1044.
PMID: 30377768 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-018-1301-1.
Robustness of cortical and subcortical processing in the presence of natural masking sounds.
Beetz M, Garcia-Rosales F, Kossl M, Hechavarria J Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):6863.
PMID: 29717258 PMC: 5931562. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25241-x.
Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.
Bee M, Christensen-Dalsgaard J Biol Cybern. 2016; 110(4-5):271-290.
PMID: 27730384 PMC: 5107320. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-016-0695-5.
Caldwell M, Lee N, Bee M J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2016; 17(4):259-70.
PMID: 27125545 PMC: 4940288. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0568-6.
Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.
Bee M Int J Psychophysiol. 2014; 95(2):216-37.
PMID: 24424243 PMC: 4096220. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.01.004.