» Articles » PMID: 18331899

Evolution of a Sensory Novelty: Tympanic Ears and the Associated Neural Processing

Overview
Journal Brain Res Bull
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Mar 12
PMID 18331899
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tympanic hearing is a true evolutionary novelty that appears to have developed independently in at least five major tetrapod groups-the anurans, turtles, lepidosaurs, archosaurs and mammals. The emergence of a tympanic ear would have increased the frequency range and sensitivity of hearing. Furthermore, tympana were acoustically coupled through the mouth cavity and therefore inherently directional in a certain frequency range, acting as pressure difference receivers. In some lizard species, this acoustical coupling generates a 50-fold directional difference, usually at relatively high frequencies (2-4kHz). In ancestral atympanate tetrapods, we hypothesize that low-frequency sound may have been processed by non-tympanic mechanisms like those in extant amphibians. The subsequent emergence of tympanic hearing would have led to changes in the central auditory processing of both high-frequency sound and directional hearing. These changes should reflect the independent origin of the tympanic ears in the major tetrapod groups. The processing of low-frequency sound, however, may have been more conserved, since the acoustical coupling of the ancestral tympanate ear probably produced little sensitivity and directionality at low frequencies. Therefore, tetrapod auditory processing may originally have been organized into low- and high-frequency streams, where only the high-frequency processing was mediated by tympanic input. The closure of the middle ear cavity in mammals and some birds is a derived condition, and may have profoundly changed the operation of the ear by decoupling the tympana, improving the low-frequency response of the tympanum, and leading to a requirement for additional neural computation of directionality in the central nervous system. We propose that these specializations transformed the low- and high-frequency streams into time and intensity pathways, respectively.

Citing Articles

Biological relevance and methodological implications of unexpected hearing thresholds in a diving bird.

Rossler H, May A, Dahne M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30592.

PMID: 39715765 PMC: 11666583. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82942-2.


Sensing of sound pressure gradients by C. elegans drives phonotaxis behavior.

Wang C, Ronan E, Kim S, Kitsopoulos P, Iliff A, Grosh K Curr Biol. 2023; 33(18):3985-3991.e4.

PMID: 37643623 PMC: 10575617. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.005.


Central projections of auditory nerve fibers in the western rat snake (Pantherophis obsoletus).

Han D, Carr C J Comp Neurol. 2023; 531(12):1261-1273.

PMID: 37245999 PMC: 10590474. DOI: 10.1002/cne.25495.


The continued importance of comparative auditory research to modern scientific discovery.

Capshaw G, Brown A, Pena J, Carr C, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Tollin D Hear Res. 2023; 433:108766.

PMID: 37084504 PMC: 10321136. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108766.


Rich acoustic landscapes dominated the Mesozoic.

Fowler-Finn K Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(3):e2220459120.

PMID: 36623182 PMC: 9933097. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2220459120.


References
1.
Clack J . Discovery of the earliest-known tetrapod stapes. Nature. 1989; 342(6248):425-7. DOI: 10.1038/342425a0. View

2.
van Bergeijk W . Evolution of the sense of hearing in vertebrates. Am Zool. 1966; 6(3):371-7. DOI: 10.1093/icb/6.3.371. View

3.
Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Manley G . Acoustical coupling of lizard eardrums. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008; 9(4):407-16. PMC: 2580811. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-008-0130-2. View

4.
Brand A, Behrend O, Marquardt T, McAlpine D, Grothe B . Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding. Nature. 2002; 417(6888):543-7. DOI: 10.1038/417543a. View

5.
Clack J . The evolution of tetrapod ears and the fossil record. Brain Behav Evol. 1997; 50(4):198-212. DOI: 10.1159/000113334. View