» Articles » PMID: 19412318

Finding a Mate at a Cocktail Party: Spatial Release from Masking Improves Acoustic Mate Recognition in Grey Treefrogs

Overview
Journal Anim Behav
Date 2009 May 5
PMID 19412318
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The 'cocktail party problem' refers to the difficulty that humans have in recognizing speech in noisy social environments. Many non-human animals also communicate acoustically in noisy social aggregations, and thus also encounter - and solve - cocktail-party-like problems. Relatively few studies, however, have investigated the processes by which non-human animals solve sound source segregation problems in the behaviourally relevant context of acoustic communication. In humans, 'spatial release from masking' contributes to sound source segregation by improving the ability of listeners to recognize speech that is spatially separated from other sources of speech or 'speech-shaped' masking noise. Using a phonotaxis paradigm, I tested the hypothesis that spatial release from masking improves the ability of female grey treefrogs, Hyla chrysoscelis, to discriminate between conspecific and heterospecific calls that were spatially separated from two sources of 'chorus-shaped' masking noise by either 15° or 90°. As the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was decreased from +3 dB to -15 dB (by decreasing the signal level in 6-dB steps), fewer females made a choice and the likelihood of a female choosing the heterospecific call also increased. At a SNR of -3 dB, females oriented toward and chose the conspecific call in the 90° separation condition, but not when signals and maskers were separated by 15°. These results support the hypothesis that a well-known solution to the cocktail party problem in humans - spatial release from masking - also plays a role in acoustic signal recognition in animals that communicate in biological equivalents of cocktail-party-like environments.

Citing Articles

A new sexual selection pattern in a frog () with ultrasonic communication.

Liu G, Pan S, Shi Q, Lei Z, Wu J, Zhang H Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2039):20242139.

PMID: 39837520 PMC: 11750359. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2139.


Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.

Calabrese G, Pfennig K Biol Lett. 2022; 18(11):20220310.

PMID: 36382373 PMC: 9667136. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0310.


Spatial release from masking in crocodilians.

Thevenet J, Papet L, Campos Z, Greenfield M, Boyer N, Grimault N Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):869.

PMID: 36008592 PMC: 9411511. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03799-7.


Customizable Recorder of Animal Kinesis (CRoAK): A multi-axis instrumented enclosure for measuring animal movements.

Gupta S, Marchetto P, Bee M HardwareX. 2022; 8:e00116.

PMID: 35498259 PMC: 9041217. DOI: 10.1016/j.ohx.2020.e00116.


Females and males respond differently to calls impaired by noise in a tree frog.

Zhang H, Zhu B, Zhou Y, He Q, Sun X, Wang J Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(13):9159-9167.

PMID: 34257950 PMC: 8258198. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7761.


References
1.
Hulse S, MacDougall-Shackleton S, Wisniewski A . Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). J Comp Psychol. 1997; 111(1):3-13. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.1.3. View

2.
Arbogast T, Mason C, Kidd Jr G . The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 112(5 Pt 1):2086-98. DOI: 10.1121/1.1510141. View

3.
Culling J, Hawley M, Litovsky R . The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 116(2):1057-65. DOI: 10.1121/1.1772396. View

4.
Ronacher B, Hoffmann C . Influence of amplitude modulated noise on the recognition of communication signals in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003; 189(6):419-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0417-z. View

5.
Holloway A, Cannatella D, Gerhardt H, Hillis D . Polyploids with different origins and ancestors form a single sexual polyploid species. Am Nat. 2006; 167(4):E88-101. DOI: 10.1086/501079. View