» Articles » PMID: 27051515

The Human Physiome: How Standards, Software and Innovative Service Infrastructures Are Providing the Building Blocks to Make It Achievable

Overview
Journal Interface Focus
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Apr 7
PMID 27051515
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reconstructing and understanding the Human Physiome virtually is a complex mathematical problem, and a highly demanding computational challenge. Mathematical models spanning from the molecular level through to whole populations of individuals must be integrated, then personalized. This requires interoperability with multiple disparate and geographically separated data sources, and myriad computational software tools. Extracting and producing knowledge from such sources, even when the databases and software are readily available, is a challenging task. Despite the difficulties, researchers must frequently perform these tasks so that available knowledge can be continually integrated into the common framework required to realize the Human Physiome. Software and infrastructures that support the communities that generate these, together with their underlying standards to format, describe and interlink the corresponding data and computer models, are pivotal to the Human Physiome being realized. They provide the foundations for integrating, exchanging and re-using data and models efficiently, and correctly, while also supporting the dissemination of growing knowledge in these forms. In this paper, we explore the standards, software tooling, repositories and infrastructures that support this work, and detail what makes them vital to realizing the Human Physiome.

Citing Articles

Toward a common standard for data and specimen provenance in life sciences.

Wittner R, Holub P, Mascia C, Frexia F, Muller H, Plass M Learn Health Syst. 2024; 8(1):e10365.

PMID: 38249839 PMC: 10797572. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10365.


Linking cortex and contraction-Integrating models along the corticomuscular pathway.

Haggie L, Schmid L, Rohrle O, Besier T, McMorland A, Saini H Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1095260.

PMID: 37234419 PMC: 10206006. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1095260.


Systems Biology in ELIXIR: modelling in the spotlight.

Martins Dos Santos V, Anton M, Szomolay B, Ostaszewski M, Arts I, Benfeitas R F1000Res. 2024; 11.

PMID: 36742342 PMC: 9871403. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.126734.2.


Lightweight Distributed Provenance Model for Complex Real-world Environments.

Wittner R, Mascia C, Gallo M, Frexia F, Muller H, Plass M Sci Data. 2022; 9(1):503.

PMID: 35977957 PMC: 9383664. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01537-6.


Addressing barriers in comprehensiveness, accessibility, reusability, interoperability and reproducibility of computational models in systems biology.

Niarakis A, Waltemath D, Glazier J, Schreiber F, Keating S, Nickerson D Brief Bioinform. 2022; 23(4).

PMID: 35671510 PMC: 9294410. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac212.


References
1.
Nickerson D, Buist M . Practical application of CellML 1.1: The integration of new mechanisms into a human ventricular myocyte model. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008; 98(1):38-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2008.05.006. View

2.
Wolstencroft K, Owen S, Krebs O, Nguyen Q, Stanford N, Golebiewski M . SEEK: a systems biology data and model management platform. BMC Syst Biol. 2015; 9:33. PMC: 4702362. DOI: 10.1186/s12918-015-0174-y. View

3.
Demir E, Cary M, Paley S, Fukuda K, Lemer C, Vastrik I . The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(9):935-42. PMC: 3001121. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1666. View

4.
Dzodic V, Hervy S, Fritsch D, Khalfallah H, Thereau M, Thomas S . Web-based tools for quantitative renal physiology. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2005; 50(7):795-800. View

5.
. Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 43(Database issue):D1049-56. PMC: 4383973. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1179. View