» Articles » PMID: 30462164

Harmonizing Semantic Annotations for Computational Models in Biology

Abstract

Life science researchers use computational models to articulate and test hypotheses about the behavior of biological systems. Semantic annotation is a critical component for enhancing the interoperability and reusability of such models as well as for the integration of the data needed for model parameterization and validation. Encoded as machine-readable links to knowledge resource terms, semantic annotations describe the computational or biological meaning of what models and data represent. These annotations help researchers find and repurpose models, accelerate model composition and enable knowledge integration across model repositories and experimental data stores. However, realizing the potential benefits of semantic annotation requires the development of model annotation standards that adhere to a community-based annotation protocol. Without such standards, tool developers must account for a variety of annotation formats and approaches, a situation that can become prohibitively cumbersome and which can defeat the purpose of linking model elements to controlled knowledge resource terms. Currently, no consensus protocol for semantic annotation exists among the larger biological modeling community. Here, we report on the landscape of current annotation practices among the COmputational Modeling in BIology NEtwork community and provide a set of recommendations for building a consensus approach to semantic annotation.

Citing Articles

The NeuroML ecosystem for standardized multi-scale modeling in neuroscience.

Sinha A, Gleeson P, Marin B, Dura-Bernal S, Panagiotou S, Crook S Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39792574 PMC: 11723582. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.95135.


Making PBPK models more reproducible in practice.

Dominguez-Romero E, Mazurenko S, Scheringer M, Martins Dos Santos V, Evelo C, Anton M Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(6).

PMID: 39494970 PMC: 11533111. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae569.


Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status, developments, and tools in 2024.

Golebiewski M, Bader G, Gleeson P, Gorochowski T, Keating S, Konig M J Integr Bioinform. 2024; 21(1).

PMID: 39026464 PMC: 11293897. DOI: 10.1515/jib-2024-0015.


Genome-scale model of predicts gene essentialities and reveals metabolic capabilities.

Leonidou N, Ostyn L, Coenye T, Crabbe A, Drager A Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(6):e0400623.

PMID: 38652457 PMC: 11237427. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04006-23.


BioKC: a collaborative platform for curation and annotation of molecular interactions.

Vega C, Ostaszewski M, Groues V, Schneider R, Satagopam V Database (Oxford). 2024; 2024.

PMID: 38537198 PMC: 10972550. DOI: 10.1093/database/baae013.


References
1.
Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

2.
Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K . KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 45(D1):D353-D361. PMC: 5210567. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1092. View

3.
Lord P, Stevens R, Brass A, Goble C . Investigating semantic similarity measures across the Gene Ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(10):1275-83. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg153. View

4.
Glont M, Nguyen T, Graesslin M, Halke R, Ali R, Schramm J . BioModels: expanding horizons to include more modelling approaches and formats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 46(D1):D1248-D1253. PMC: 5753244. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx1023. View

5.
Krause F, Uhlendorf J, Lubitz T, Schulz M, Klipp E, Liebermeister W . Annotation and merging of SBML models with semanticSBML. Bioinformatics. 2009; 26(3):421-2. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp642. View