» Articles » PMID: 29463246

Next-generation, Personalised, Model-based Critical Care Medicine: a State-of-the Art Review of in Silico Virtual Patient Models, Methods, and Cohorts, and How to Validation Them

Abstract

Critical care, like many healthcare areas, is under a dual assault from significantly increasing demographic and economic pressures. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are highly variable in response to treatment, and increasingly aging populations mean ICUs are under increasing demand and their cohorts are increasingly ill. Equally, patient expectations are growing, while the economic ability to deliver care to all is declining. Better, more productive care is thus the big challenge. One means to that end is personalised care designed to manage the significant inter- and intra-patient variability that makes the ICU patient difficult. Thus, moving from current "one size fits all" protocolised care to adaptive, model-based "one method fits all" personalised care could deliver the required step change in the quality, and simultaneously the productivity and cost, of care. Computer models of human physiology are a unique tool to personalise care, as they can couple clinical data with mathematical methods to create subject-specific models and virtual patients to design new, personalised and more optimal protocols, as well as to guide care in real-time. They rely on identifying time varying patient-specific parameters in the model that capture inter- and intra-patient variability, the difference between patients and the evolution of patient condition. Properly validated, virtual patients represent the real patients, and can be used in silico to test different protocols or interventions, or in real-time to guide care. Hence, the underlying models and methods create the foundation for next generation care, as well as a tool for safely and rapidly developing personalised treatment protocols over large virtual cohorts using virtual trials. This review examines the models and methods used to create virtual patients. Specifically, it presents the models types and structures used and the data required. It then covers how to validate the resulting virtual patients and trials, and how these virtual trials can help design and optimise clinical trial. Links between these models and higher order, more complex physiome models are also discussed. In each section, it explores the progress reported up to date, especially on core ICU therapies in glycemic, circulatory and mechanical ventilation management, where high cost and frequency of occurrence provide a significant opportunity for model-based methods to have measurable clinical and economic impact. The outcomes are readily generalised to other areas of medical care.

Citing Articles

Thirteen serum biochemical indexes and five whole blood coagulation indices in a point-of-care testing analyzer: ideal protocol for evaluating pulmonary and critical care medicine.

Liu M, Liu L, Chen J, Huang Z, Zhu H, Lin S J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2025; 26(2):158-171.

PMID: 40015935 PMC: 11867784. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2300433.


Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental and models.

Rolf-Pissarczyk M, Schussnig R, Fries T, Fleischmann D, Elefteriades J, Humphrey J Prog Mater Sci. 2025; 150.

PMID: 39830801 PMC: 11737592. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101363.


Patient-specific prostate tumour growth simulation: a first step towards the digital twin.

Perez-Benito A, Garcia-Aznar J, Gomez-Benito M, Perez M Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1421591.

PMID: 39539952 PMC: 11557540. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1421591.


CARETestLung: A mechanical test lung with Configurable airway Resistance, lung Elastance, and breathing efforts.

Yang Tay W, Ang C, Chiew Y, Chase J HardwareX. 2024; 19:e00579.

PMID: 39318641 PMC: 11419886. DOI: 10.1016/j.ohx.2024.e00579.


Computational Simulation of Virtual Patients Reduces Dataset Bias and Improves Machine Learning-Based Detection of ARDS from Noisy Heterogeneous ICU Datasets.

Sharafutdinov K, Fritsch S, Iravani M, Farhadi Ghalati P, Saffaran S, Bates D IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024; 5:611-620.

PMID: 39184970 PMC: 11342939. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3243190.


References
1.
Krinsley J, Jones R . Cost analysis of intensive glycemic control in critically ill adult patients. Chest. 2006; 129(3):644-50. DOI: 10.1378/chest.129.3.644. View

2.
Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S, Besbes L, Boukef R, Mohamed B . Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(10):2339-43. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000182801.48137.13. View

3.
Sundaresan A, Chase J, Shaw G, Chiew Y, Desaive T . Model-based optimal PEEP in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients in the intensive care unit. Biomed Eng Online. 2011; 10:64. PMC: 3167768. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-64. View

4.
Chiew Y, Chase J, Shaw G, Sundaresan A, Desaive T . Model-based PEEP optimisation in mechanical ventilation. Biomed Eng Online. 2011; 10:111. PMC: 3339371. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-111. View

5.
Jansen J, Maas J, Pinsky M . Bedside assessment of mean systemic filling pressure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010; 16(3):231-6. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283378185. View