» Articles » PMID: 26700827

Safety, Efficacy, and Short-term Follow-up of the Use of Pipeline Embolization Device in Small (<2.5 Mm) Cerebral Vessels for Aneurysm Treatment: Single Institution Experience

Overview
Journal Neuroradiology
Specialties Neurology
Radiology
Date 2015 Dec 25
PMID 26700827
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Flow diversion is being increasingly used to treat cerebral aneurysms. We present our experience using these stents to treat aneurysms distal to the circle of Willis with parent arteries smaller than 2.5 mm.

Methods: Aneurysms treated with a Pipeline Embolization Device in vessels less than 2.5 mm between June 2012 and August 2014 were included. We evaluated risk factors, family history of aneurysms, aneurysm characteristics, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and modified Rankin scale (mRS) on admission and angiography and clinical outcome at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year.

Results: We included seven patients with a mean age of 65 years. The parent vessel size ranged from 1.5 to 2.3 mm; mean 1.9 mm. Location of the aneurysms was as follows: two aneurysms centered along the pericallosal artery (one left, one right), one on the right angular artery, one aneurysm at the anterior communicating artery (ACom), one at the ACom-right A2 anterior cerebral artery (ACA), one at the lenticulostriate artery, and one at the A1-A2 ACA artery. Aneurysms ranged from 1 to 12 mm in diameter. All aneurysms were treated with a single Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). No peri- or post-procedural complications or mortality occurred. The patients were discharged with no change in NIHSS or mRS score. Angiographic follow-up was available in six patients. Angiography showed complete aneurysm occlusion in all. NIHSS and mRS remained unchanged at follow-up.

Conclusion: Our preliminary results show that flow diversion technology is an effective and safe therapy for aneurysms located on small cerebral arteries. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate our promising results.

Citing Articles

Pipeline versus non-pipeline flow diverter treatment for M1 aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Senol Y, Orscelik A, Bilgin C, Kobeissi H, Ghozy S, Arul S Neuroradiol J. 2024; :19714009241260805.

PMID: 39033417 PMC: 11571521. DOI: 10.1177/19714009241260805.


Endovascular treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms using flow modulation devices: mid- and long-term results from a two-center study.

Khanafer A, Henkes H, Cohen J, Albina-Palmarola P, Gomori J, Forsting M Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1368612.

PMID: 38529030 PMC: 10962386. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1368612.


Treatment Outcomes of 94 Cases of Pipeline Embolization Device in a Single Center: Predictive Factors of Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion.

Hiramatsu R, Yagi R, Kameda M, Nonoguchi N, Furuse M, Kawabata S J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2023; 17(10):217-223.

PMID: 37869485 PMC: 10586884. DOI: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0027.


Initial and mid-term results of LEO Baby stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms located in small arteries: A single-center experience with 131 consecutive patients.

Shen Y, Ni H, Li J, Jia Z, Cao Y, Shi H Front Neurol. 2022; 13:990532.

PMID: 36176553 PMC: 9513362. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.990532.


Flow Diverting Stents in Cerebral Small Caliber Vessels (< 2 mm) for Aneurysm Treatment : A Three Center Retrospective Study.

Hohenstatt S, Vinci S, Vollherbst D, Tessitore A, Schmitt N, Pitrone A Clin Neuroradiol. 2022; 33(1):99-105.

PMID: 35768696 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-022-01187-6.


References
1.
Yavuz K, Geyik S, Saatci I, Cekirge H . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013; 35(3):529-35. PMC: 7964741. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3692. View

2.
Cinar C, Oran I, Bozkaya H, Ozgiray E . Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms with special reference to the flow-diverting strategy. Neuroradiology. 2013; 55(4):441-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-013-1136-y. View

3.
Mitchell B, Momin E, Jou L, Shaltoni H, Morsi H, Mawad M . Extensive bilateral vertebral artery remodeling following treatment of dissection using pipeline embolic device. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2015; 7(5):5-8. PMC: 4280872. View

4.
Martin A, Cruz J, OKelly C, Kelly M, Spears J, Marotta T . Small pipes: preliminary experience with 3-mm or smaller pipeline flow-diverting stents for aneurysm repair prior to regulatory approval. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014; 36(3):557-61. PMC: 8013041. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4170. View

5.
Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, Brunel H, Pierot L, Gabrillargues J . Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33(6):1150-5. PMC: 8013262. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2907. View