» Articles » PMID: 24083050

Immediate and Follow-up Results for 44 Consecutive Cases of Small (<10 Mm) Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms Treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device

Overview
Journal Surg Neurol Int
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Oct 2
PMID 24083050
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The pipeline embolization device (PED) provides effective, durable and safe endovascular reconstruction of large and giant intracranial aneurysms. However, 80% of all cerebral aneurysms found in the general population are less than 10 mm in size. Treatment of small aneurysms (<10 mm) with flow diverters may be advantageous over endosaccular modalities that carry risks of procedural rupture during aneurysm access or coil placement.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a prospective, single-center aneurysm database to identify all patients with small (<10 mm) internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms who underwent endovascular treatment using the PED. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, complications, and technical and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Forty-four cases were performed in 41 patients (age range 31-78 years). PED was successfully implanted in 42 cases. A single PED was used in 37/42 (88%) cases. Mean postprocedure hospital stay was 1.7 ± 0.3 days and 98% of patients were discharged home. Major complication occurred in one patient (2.3%), who died of early subarachnoid hemorrhage. Transient neurological deficit, delayed intracerebral hemorrhage (asymptomatic), and delayed groin infection occurred in one patient each. Follow-up rate was 91.8% (45 aneurysms in 35 patients) with a mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 1.9 months. By 6 months post-PED implantation, angiographic success (complete or near complete aneurysm occlusion) was observed in 80%. Mild (<50%), asymptomatic, nonflow limiting in-stent stenosis was observed in 5.4% (2/37 cases). All the 35 patients with follow-up remained at preprocedure neurological baseline.

Conclusion: Small (<10 mm) ICA aneurysm treatment with PED implantation is safe and carries a high rate of early angiographic success.

Citing Articles

Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device (PREMIER study): 3-year results with the application of a flow diverter specific occlusion classification.

Hanel R, Cortez G, Lopes D, Nelson P, Siddiqui A, Jabbour P J Neurointerv Surg. 2022; 15(3):248-254.

PMID: 35292570 PMC: 9985759. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018501.


Giant aneurysm of the bilateral vertebrobasilar junction treated by pipeline and coils: A case report and literature review.

Zhang C, Shi Z, Yan Z, Ding C, Cao J, Wang Y Exp Ther Med. 2020; 21(1):40.

PMID: 33273970 PMC: 7706383. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.9472.


Reduced 2-year aneurysm retreatment and costs among patients treated with flow diversion versus non-flow diversion embolization: A Premier Healthcare Database retrospective cohort study.

Grandhi R, Karsy M, Taussky P, Ricker C, Malhotra A PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234478.

PMID: 32555657 PMC: 7302520. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234478.


Advances in endovascular aneurysm management: flow modulation techniques with braided mesh devices.

Campos J, Cheaney Ii B, Lien B, Zarrin D, Vo C, Colby G Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020; 5(1):1-13.

PMID: 32411402 PMC: 7213520. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000347.


Expanding Indications for Flow Diverters: Distal Aneurysms, Bifurcation Aneurysms, Small Aneurysms, Previously Coiled Aneurysms and Clipped Aneurysms, and Carotid Cavernous Fistulas.

Limbucci N, Leone G, Renieri L, Nappini S, Cagnazzo F, Laiso A Neurosurgery. 2019; 86(Suppl 1):S85-S94.

PMID: 31838532 PMC: 6911737. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz334.


References
1.
Joo S, Lee S, Noh S, Jeong Y, Kim M, Jeong Y . What Is the Significance of a Large Number of Ruptured Aneurysms Smaller than 7 mm in Diameter?. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 45(2):85-9. PMC: 2651552. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2009.45.2.85. View

2.
Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna H . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64(4):632-42. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65. View

3.
Levy E, Koebbe C, Horowitz M, Jungreis C, Pride G, Dutton K . Rupture of intracranial aneurysms during endovascular coiling: management and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2001; 49(4):807-11; discussion 811-3. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200110000-00005. View

4.
Nelson P, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel S, Wanke I, Fiorella D . The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 32(1):34-40. PMC: 7964968. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2421. View

5.
Phillips T, Wenderoth J, Phatouros C, Rice H, Singh T, Devilliers L . Safety of the pipeline embolization device in treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33(7):1225-31. PMC: 7965498. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3166. View