» Articles » PMID: 23321438

Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Flow Diverters: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Stroke
Date 2013 Jan 17
PMID 23321438
Citations 319
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Flow diverters are important tools in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, their impact on aneurysmal occlusion rates, morbidity, mortality, and complication rates is not fully examined.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature searching multiple databases for reports on the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow-diverter devices. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool outcomes of aneurysmal occlusion rates at 6 months, and procedure-related morbidity, mortality, and complications across studies.

Results: A total of 29 studies were included in this analysis, including 1451 patients with 1654 aneurysms. Aneurysmal complete occlusion rate was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-81%). Procedure-related morbidity and mortality were 5% (95% CI, 4%-7%) and 4% (95% CI, 3%-6%), respectively. The rate of postoperative subarachnoid hemorrhage was 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%). Intraparenchymal hemorrhage rate was 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%). Perforator infarction rate was 3% (95% CI, 1%-5%), with significantly lower odds of perforator infarction among patients with anterior circulation aneurysms compared with those with posterior circulation aneurysms (odds ratio, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.08; P<0.0001). Ischemic stroke rate was 6% (95% CI, 4%-9%), with significantly lower odds of perforator infarction among patients with anterior circulation aneurysms compared with those with posterior circulation aneurysms (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08-0.27; P<0.0001).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow-diverter devices is feasible and effective with high complete occlusion rates. However, the risk of procedure-related morbidity and mortality is not negligible. Patients with posterior circulation aneurysms are at higher risk of ischemic stroke, particularly perforator infarction. These findings should be considered when considering the best therapeutic option for intracranial aneurysms.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of FeMnN alloy bioresorbable flow diverters in the rabbit elastase induced aneurysm model.

Oliver A, Bilgin C, Cortese J, Bayraktar E, Dai D, Ding Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1522696.

PMID: 40070550 PMC: 11893611. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1522696.


Cerebral foreign body reaction (CFBR) after endovascular treatments is a rare event to be aware of: case series and review of literature.

Atanasio G, Bertino S, Velo M, Tessitore A, Zaccone C, Masaracchio A J Neurol. 2025; 272(3):251.

PMID: 40047950 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-12957-w.


Multicenter study of HPC coated p48 and p64 flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms under dual antiplatelet therapy.

Goertz L, Weyland C, Nikoubashman O, Burkle F, de Beukelaer F, Siebert E Interv Neuroradiol. 2025; :15910199251318066.

PMID: 39995047 PMC: 11851587. DOI: 10.1177/15910199251318066.


The morphological, clinical, and prognostic factors in the management of giant anterior communicating artery aneurysms: A systematic review of cases.

Nasir R, Naqvi M, Ahmed S, Hassan M, Tariq R, Khan S Brain Spine. 2025; 5:104189.

PMID: 39990117 PMC: 11847273. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104189.


The evaluation of the flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) for the treatment of selected intracranial aneurysms: a Polish multicenter study.

Jaworski M, Krysiak R, Zylkowski J, Banach M, Zbroszczyk M, Smulska K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6386.

PMID: 39984615 PMC: 11845520. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90463-9.