Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations
Overview
Affiliations
The present study assessed the impact of sample size on the power and fit of structural equation modeling applied to functional brain connectivity hypotheses. The data consisted of time-constrained minimum norm estimates of regional brain activity during performance of a reading task obtained with magnetoencephalography. Power analysis was first conducted for an autoregressive model with 5 latent variables (brain regions), each defined by 3 indicators (successive activity time bins). A series of simulations were then run by generating data from an existing pool of 51 typical readers (aged 7.5-12.5 years). Sample sizes ranged between 20 and 1,000 participants and for each sample size 1,000 replications were run. Results were evaluated using chi-square Type I errors, model convergence, mean RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) values, confidence intervals of the RMSEA, structural path stability, and D-Fit index values. Results suggested that 70 to 80 participants were adequate to model relationships reflecting close to not so close fit as per MacCallum et al.'s recommendations. Sample sizes of 50 participants were associated with satisfactory fit. It is concluded that structural equation modeling is a viable methodology to model complex regional interdependencies in brain activation in pediatric populations.
Blockchain technology and its impact on sustainable supply chain management in SMEs.
Fang C, Ullah N, Batumalay M, Al-Rahmi W, Alblehai F PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025; 11:e2466.
PMID: 40062281 PMC: 11888871. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2466.
Marzaleh M, Bastani P, Raeyat Mohtashami A, Farhadi P, Ghanbari S, Ravangard R Health Serv Insights. 2025; 18:11786329251316668.
PMID: 39917359 PMC: 11800262. DOI: 10.1177/11786329251316668.
Ziganshina L, Garaeva A, Talipova L, Khairullin R, Dikken J, van Hoof J Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41100.
PMID: 39807523 PMC: 11728952. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41100.
Growth Mindset Is Associated With Mastery Goals in Adulthood.
Combette L, Rotge J, Schmidt L Eur J Psychol. 2024; 20(3):191-201.
PMID: 39678922 PMC: 11638699. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.11915.
Atanassova D, Mathys C, Diaconescu A, Madariaga V, Oosterman J, Brazil I Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):86.
PMID: 39277698 PMC: 11401891. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00133-1.