» Articles » PMID: 26824167

The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation

Overview
Date 2016 Jan 30
PMID 26824167
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The noncentral chi-square distribution plays a key role in structural equation modeling (SEM). The likelihood ratio test statistic that accompanies virtually all SEMs asymptotically follows a noncentral chi-square under certain assumptions relating to misspecification and multivariate distribution. Many scholars use the noncentral chi-square distribution in the construction of fit indices, such as Steiger and Lind's (1980) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) or the family of baseline fit indices (e.g., RNI, CFI), and for the computation of statistical power for model hypothesis testing. Despite this wide use, surprisingly little is known about the extent to which the test statistic follows a noncentral chi-square in applied research. Our study examines several hypotheses about the suitability of the noncentral chi-square distribution for the usual SEM test statistic under conditions commonly encountered in practice. We designed Monte Carlo computer simulation experiments to empirically test these research hypotheses. Our experimental conditions included seven sample sizes ranging from 50 to 1000, and three distinct model types, each with five specifications ranging from a correct model to the severely misspecified uncorrelated baseline model. In general, we found that for models with small to moderate misspecification, the noncentral chi-square distribution is well approximated when the sample size is large (e.g., greater than 200), but there was evidence of bias in both mean and variance in smaller samples. A key finding was that the test statistics for the uncorrelated variable baseline model did not follow the noncentral chi-square distribution for any model type across any sample size. We discuss the implications of our findings for the SEM fit indices and power estimation procedures that are based on the noncentral chi-square distribution as well as potential directions for future research.

Citing Articles

Early handwriting development: a longitudinal perspective on handwriting time, legibility, and spelling.

Truxius L, Sagesser Wyss J, Maurer M Front Psychol. 2025; 15():1466061.

PMID: 39845535 PMC: 11752449. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1466061.


Psychometric Evaluation of the Decision Fatigue Scale among Korean Registered Nurses.

Hur Y, Hickman R Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(15).

PMID: 39120227 PMC: 11312083. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12151524.


Examining the performance of the chi-square difference test when the unrestricted model is slightly misspecified.

Folk D, Savalei V Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(7):6687-6706.

PMID: 38565742 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02384-6.


Advantages of Using Unweighted Approximation Error Measures for Model Fit Assessment.

Lubbe D Psychometrika. 2023; 88(2):413-433.

PMID: 37071271 PMC: 10188575. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-023-09909-6.


Autonomy versus support: self-reliance and help-seeking for mental health problems in young people.

Ishikawa A, Rickwood D, Bariola E, Bhullar N Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022; 58(3):489-499.

PMID: 36112162 PMC: 9971084. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02361-4.