» Articles » PMID: 25705052

Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2015 Feb 24
PMID 25705052
Citations 545
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Determining sample size requirements for structural equation modeling (SEM) is a challenge often faced by investigators, peer reviewers, and grant writers. Recent years have seen a large increase in SEMs in the behavioral science literature, but consideration of sample size requirements for applied SEMs often relies on outdated rules-of-thumb. This study used Monte Carlo data simulation techniques to evaluate sample size requirements for common applied SEMs. Across a series of simulations, we systematically varied key model properties, including number of indicators and factors, magnitude of factor loadings and path coefficients, and amount of missing data. We investigated how changes in these parameters affected sample size requirements with respect to statistical power, bias in the parameter estimates, and overall solution propriety. Results revealed a range of sample size requirements (i.e., from 30 to 460 cases), meaningful patterns of association between parameters and sample size, and highlight the limitations of commonly cited rules-of-thumb. The broad "lessons learned" for determining SEM sample size requirements are discussed.

Citing Articles

Predicting Anxiety and Depression Based on Video Game Addiction with the Mediating Role of Social Support.

Jahanbakhshi Z, Rezvani N, Pourhasan M, Ahmadi S, Ahmadi S Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2025; 53(2):267-274.

PMID: 40071367 PMC: 11898247. DOI: 10.62641/aep.v53i2.1745.


Optimizing working memory assessment: development of shortened versions of complex spans, updating, and binding tasks.

Monteiro F, Nascimento L, Leitao J, Santos E, Rodrigues P, Santos I Psychol Res. 2025; 89(2):65.

PMID: 40056259 PMC: 11890332. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-025-02083-7.


Indonesian Translation and Adaptation of Social Appearance Anxiety Scale (SAAS) for Early Adolescent Girls in Indonesia.

Putri B, Noer A, Pebriani L, Purba F Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025; 18:475-485.

PMID: 40046606 PMC: 11881766. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S498021.


Moral transgressions, psychological well-being, and family conflict in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of self-forgiveness.

Paleari F, Cavagnis L, Ertan I, Fincham F BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):200.

PMID: 40038826 PMC: 11881389. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02513-6.


Exploring the Validity of Adolescent Responses to a Measure of Psychological Flexibility and Inflexibility.

Farley C, Renshaw T Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001828 PMC: 11852026. DOI: 10.3390/bs15020197.


References
1.
Enders C . The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychol Methods. 2002; 6(4):352-70. View

2.
Kelley K, Maxwell S . Sample size for multiple regression: obtaining regression coefficients that are accurate, not simply significant. Psychol Methods. 2003; 8(3):305-21. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.305. View

3.
Cole D, Maxwell S . Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003; 112(4):558-77. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558. View

4.
Maxwell S . The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychol Methods. 2004; 9(2):147-63. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.2.147. View

5.
Maxwell S, Kelley K, Rausch J . Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007; 59:537-63. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093735. View