» Articles » PMID: 35707745

Future Directions for Chemosensory Connectomes: Best Practices and Specific Challenges

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Jun 16
PMID 35707745
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ecological chemosensory stimuli almost always evoke responses in more than one sensory system. Moreover, any sensory processing takes place along a hierarchy of brain regions. So far, the field of chemosensory neuroimaging is dominated by studies that examine the role of brain regions in isolation. However, to completely understand neural processing of chemosensation, we must also examine interactions between regions. In general, the use of connectivity methods has increased in the neuroimaging field, providing important insights to physical sensory processing, such as vision, audition, and touch. A similar trend has been observed in chemosensory neuroimaging, however, these established techniques have largely not been rigorously applied to imaging studies on the chemical senses, leaving network insights overlooked. In this article, we first highlight some recent work in chemosensory connectomics and we summarize different connectomics techniques. Then, we outline specific challenges for chemosensory connectome neuroimaging studies. Finally, we review best practices from the general connectomics and neuroimaging fields. We recommend future studies to develop or use the following methods we perceive as key to improve chemosensory connectomics: (1) optimized study designs, (2) reporting guidelines, (3) consensus on brain parcellations, (4) consortium research, and (5) data sharing.

Citing Articles

Prediction of alcohol intake patterns with olfactory and gustatory brain connectivity networks.

Agarwal K, Chaudhary S, Tomasi D, Volkow N, Joseph P Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025; .

PMID: 39962224 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-025-02058-7.


Graph theory applications in congenital heart disease.

Lee Y, Chen S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11135.

PMID: 37429950 PMC: 10333187. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38233-3.


Interconnected sub-networks of the macaque monkey gustatory connectome.

Hartig R, Karimi A, Evrard H Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:818800.

PMID: 36874640 PMC: 9978403. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.818800.


Functional Connectivity of the Chemosenses: A Review.

Farruggia M, Pellegrino R, Scheinost D Front Syst Neurosci. 2022; 16:865929.

PMID: 35813269 PMC: 9257046. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.865929.

References
1.
Honey C, Sporns O, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Thiran J, Meuli R . Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(6):2035-40. PMC: 2634800. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811168106. View

2.
Pauli W, Nili A, Michael Tyszka J . A high-resolution probabilistic in vivo atlas of human subcortical brain nuclei. Sci Data. 2018; 5:180063. PMC: 5903366. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.63. View

3.
Iravani B, Peter M, Arshamian A, Olsson M, Hummel T, Kitzler H . Acquired olfactory loss alters functional connectivity and morphology. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):16422. PMC: 8361122. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95968-7. View

4.
Hubel D, Wiesel T . RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1965; 28:229-89. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.229. View

5.
Hodgson K, Poldrack R, Curran J, Knowles E, Mathias S, Goring H . Shared Genetic Factors Influence Head Motion During MRI and Body Mass Index. Cereb Cortex. 2016; 27(12):5539-5546. PMC: 6075600. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw321. View