» Articles » PMID: 24982597

Toward Enhanced MIQE Compliance: Reference Residual Normalization of QPCR Gene Expression Data

Overview
Journal J Biomol Tech
Date 2014 Jul 2
PMID 24982597
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Normalization of fluorescence-based quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) data varies across quantitative gene expression studies, despite its integral role in accurate data quantification and interpretation. Identification of suitable reference genes plays an essential role in accurate qPCR normalization, as it ensures that uncorrected gene expression data reflect normalized data. The reference residual normalization (RRN) method presented here is a modified approach to conventional 2(-ΔΔCt)qPCR normalization that increases mathematical transparency and incorporates statistical assessment of reference gene stability. RRN improves mathematical transparency through the use of sample-specific reference residuals (RR i ) that are generated from the mean Ct of one or more reference gene(s) that are unaffected by treatment. To determine stability of putative reference genes, RRN uses ANOVA to assess the effect of treatment on expression and subsequent equivalence-threshold testing to establish the minimum permitted resolution. Step-by-step instructions and comprehensive examples that demonstrate the influence of reference gene stability on target gene normalization and interpretation are provided. Through mathematical transparency and statistical rigor, RRN promotes compliance with Minimum Information for Quantitative Experiments and, in so doing, provides increased confidence in qPCR data analysis and interpretation.

Citing Articles

Differential expressions of FASN, SCD, and FABP4 genes in the ribeye muscle of omega-3 oil-supplemented Tattykeel Australian White lambs.

Otto J, Pewan S, Edmunds R, Mwangi F, Kinobe R, Adegboye O BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):666.

PMID: 37932697 PMC: 10626737. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09771-x.


Evaluation of potential reference genes in the biting midge Culicoides sonorensis for real-time quantitative PCR analyses.

Osborne C, Cooper A, Hall B, Bird E, Nayduch D, Silver K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):16729.

PMID: 37794144 PMC: 10550929. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43750-2.


Impact of changes at the cell surface upon immunogenicity and colonisation in the gastrointestinal tract.

Avelar G, Dambuza I, Ricci L, Yuecel R, MacKenzie K, Childers D Cell Surf. 2022; 8:100084.

PMID: 36299406 PMC: 9589014. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcsw.2022.100084.


Identification of suitable reference genes for mesenchymal stem cells from menstrual blood of women with endometriosis.

Zucherato V, Penariol L, Silva L, Padovan C, Poli-Neto O, Rosa-E-Silva J Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):5422.

PMID: 33686153 PMC: 7970877. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84884-5.


Selection and evaluation of appropriate reference genes for RT-qPCR based expression analysis in Candida tropicalis following azole treatment.

Paul S, Singh S, Chakrabarti A, Rudramurthy S, Ghosh A Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):1972.

PMID: 32029802 PMC: 7004996. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58744-7.


References
1.
McCurley A, Callard G . Characterization of housekeeping genes in zebrafish: male-female differences and effects of tissue type, developmental stage and chemical treatment. BMC Mol Biol. 2008; 9:102. PMC: 2588455. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-9-102. View

2.
Mattick J, Makunin I . Small regulatory RNAs in mammals. Hum Mol Genet. 2005; 14 Spec No 1:R121-32. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddi101. View

3.
Bustin S . Why the need for qPCR publication guidelines?--The case for MIQE. Methods. 2009; 50(4):217-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.12.006. View

4.
Pfaffl M, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians T . Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper--Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004; 26(6):509-15. DOI: 10.1023/b:bile.0000019559.84305.47. View

5.
Livak K, Schmittgen T . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2002; 25(4):402-8. DOI: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. View