» Articles » PMID: 27000656

Selection of Suitable Reference Genes for Gene Expression Studies in Staphylococcus Capitis During Growth Under Erythromycin Stress

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2016 Mar 23
PMID 27000656
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate and reproducible measurement of gene transcription requires appropriate reference genes, which are stably expressed under different experimental conditions to provide normalization. Staphylococcus capitis is a human pathogen that produces biofilm under stress, such as imposed by antimicrobial agents. In this study, a set of five commonly used staphylococcal reference genes (gyrB, sodA, recA, tuf and rpoB) were systematically evaluated in two clinical isolates of Staphylococcus capitis (S. capitis subspecies urealyticus and capitis, respectively) under erythromycin stress in mid-log and stationary phases. Two public software programs (geNorm and NormFinder) and two manual calculation methods, reference residue normalization (RRN) and relative quantitative (RQ), were applied. The potential reference genes selected by the four algorithms were further validated by comparing the expression of a well-studied biofilm gene (icaA) with phenotypic biofilm formation in S. capitis under four different experimental conditions. The four methods differed considerably in their ability to predict the most suitable reference gene or gene combination for comparing icaA expression under different conditions. Under the conditions used here, the RQ method provided better selection of reference genes than the other three algorithms; however, this finding needs to be confirmed with a larger number of isolates. This study reinforces the need to assess the stability of reference genes for analysis of target gene expression under different conditions and the use of more than one algorithm in such studies. Although this work was conducted using a specific human pathogen, it emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable reference genes for accurate normalization of gene expression more generally.

Citing Articles

Marine produce zeaxanthin via the mevalonate pathway.

Chen Y, Xie J, Yang M, Cai R, Cai C, Gan Y Mar Life Sci Technol. 2025; 7(1):132-143.

PMID: 40027326 PMC: 11871244. DOI: 10.1007/s42995-024-00268-4.


Screening of stable internal reference gene of Quinoa under hormone treatment and abiotic stress.

Zhu X, Wang B, Wang X, Wei X Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2021; 27(11):2459-2470.

PMID: 34924704 PMC: 8639980. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-021-01094-z.


The carbon source-dependent pattern of antimicrobial activity and gene expression in Pseudomonas donghuensis P482.

Matuszewska M, Maciag T, Rajewska M, Wierzbicka A, Jafra S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10994.

PMID: 34040089 PMC: 8154892. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90488-w.

References
1.
Schmidt K, Manna A, Cheung A . SarT influences sarS expression in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2003; 71(9):5139-48. PMC: 187355. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.9.5139-5148.2003. View

2.
Koenigstein S, Pohlmann K, Held C, Abele D . Ecological comparison of cellular stress responses among populations - normalizing RT-qPCR values to investigate differential environmental adaptations. BMC Ecol. 2013; 13:21. PMC: 3663710. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-13-21. View

3.
Scherr T, Roux C, Hanke M, Angle A, Dunman P, Kielian T . Global transcriptome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in response to innate immune cells. Infect Immun. 2013; 81(12):4363-76. PMC: 3837966. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00819-13. View

4.
Baltch A, Smith R, Franke M, MICHELSEN P . Antibacterial effects of levofloxacin, erythromycin, and rifampin in a human monocyte system against Legionella pneumophila. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998; 42(12):3153-6. PMC: 106015. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.12.3153. View

5.
Giaouris E, Heir E, Hebraud M, Chorianopoulos N, Langsrud S, Moretro T . Attachment and biofilm formation by foodborne bacteria in meat processing environments: causes, implications, role of bacterial interactions and control by alternative novel methods. Meat Sci. 2013; 97(3):298-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.023. View