» Articles » PMID: 21043998

Comparison of Three Methods for the Derivation of a Biologic Scaffold Composed of Adipose Tissue Extracellular Matrix

Overview
Date 2010 Nov 4
PMID 21043998
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Extracellular matrix (ECM)-based scaffold materials have been used successfully in both preclinical and clinical tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches to tissue reconstruction. Results of numerous studies have shown that ECM scaffolds are capable of supporting the growth and differentiation of multiple cell types in vitro and of acting as inductive templates for constructive tissue remodeling after implantation in vivo. Adipose tissue represents a potentially abundant source of ECM and may represent an ideal substrate for the growth and adipogenic differentiation of stem cells harvested from this tissue. Numerous studies have shown that the methods by which ECM scaffold materials are prepared have a dramatic effect upon both the biochemical and structural properties of the resultant ECM scaffold material as well as the ability of the material to support a positive tissue remodeling outcome after implantation. The objective of the present study was to characterize the adipose ECM material resulting from three methods of decellularization to determine the most effective method for the derivation of an adipose tissue ECM scaffold that was largely free of potentially immunogenic cellular content while retaining tissue-specific structural and functional components as well as the ability to support the growth and adipogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells. The results show that each of the decellularization methods produced an adipose ECM scaffold that was distinct from both a structural and biochemical perspective, emphasizing the importance of the decellularization protocol used to produce adipose ECM scaffolds. Further, the results suggest that the adipose ECM scaffolds produced using the methods described herein are capable of supporting the maintenance and adipogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells and may represent effective substrates for use in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches to soft tissue reconstruction.

Citing Articles

Towards Safety and Regulation Criteria for Clinical Applications of Decellularized Organ-Derived Matrices.

van Hengel E, van der Laan L, De Jonge J, Verstegen M Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001655 PMC: 11851377. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020136.


Efficacy and Safety of Cell-Assisted Acellular Adipose Matrix Transfer for Volume Retention and Regeneration Compared to Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection.

Jin X, Yoo H, Tran V, Yi C, Hong K, Chang H Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 39354227 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04408-0.


Engineering cell-derived extracellular matrix for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Xu Y, Liu X, Ahmad M, Ao Q, Yu Y, Shao D Mater Today Bio. 2024; 27:101125.

PMID: 38979129 PMC: 11228803. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101125.


Cell-Derived Matrix: Production, Decellularization, and Application of Wound Repair.

Xu Y, Yao Y, Gao J Stem Cells Int. 2024; 2024:7398473.

PMID: 38882595 PMC: 11178417. DOI: 10.1155/2024/7398473.


Effect of Injectable Acellular Adipose Matrix on Soft Tissue Reconstruction in a Murine Model.

Kim J, Tran V, Hong K, Chang H Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; 48(11):2210-2219.

PMID: 38499876 PMC: 11150185. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03924-3.


References
1.
Valentin J, Turner N, Gilbert T, Badylak S . Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold. Biomaterials. 2010; 31(29):7475-84. PMC: 2922042. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.039. View

2.
Sarikaya A, Record R, Wu C, Tullius B, Badylak S, Ladisch M . Antimicrobial activity associated with extracellular matrices. Tissue Eng. 2002; 8(1):63-71. DOI: 10.1089/107632702753503063. View

3.
Butterwick K, Nootheti P, Hsu J, Goldman M . Autologous fat transfer: an in-depth look at varying concepts and techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2007; 15(1):99-111, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2006.10.003. View

4.
Patrick Jr C . Tissue engineering strategies for adipose tissue repair. Anat Rec. 2001; 263(4):361-6. DOI: 10.1002/ar.1113. View

5.
Brennan E, Reing J, Chew D, Myers-Irvin J, Young E, Badylak S . Antibacterial activity within degradation products of biological scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng. 2007; 12(10):2949-55. PMC: 3056877. DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.2949. View