» Articles » PMID: 39354227

Efficacy and Safety of Cell-Assisted Acellular Adipose Matrix Transfer for Volume Retention and Regeneration Compared to Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Oct 1
PMID 39354227
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cell-assisted acellular adipose matrix (AAM) transfer is a novel technique for soft tissue volume restoration, where AAM acts as a scaffold for tissue proliferation and promotes host cell migration, vascularization, and adipogenesis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of in vivo cell-assisted AAM transfer compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injection.

Methods: Human adipose tissue was used to manufacture AAM, and murine adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) were prepared. Nude mice were divided into four groups: AAM transfer (AT), ASC-assisted AAM transfer (CAT), HA filler injection (HI), and ASC-assisted HA filler injection (CHI). Eight weeks post-transfer, in vivo graft volume/weight, histology, and gene expression were analyzed to assess efficacy and safety.

Results: The AAM retained its three-dimensional scaffold structure without cellular components. AT/CAT showed lower volume retention than HA/CHA; however, CAT maintained a similar volume to HA. Histologically, adipogenesis and collagen formation were increased in AT/CAT compared to HA/CHA, with CAT showing the highest levels. CAT also demonstrated superior angiogenesis, adipogenesis, and gene expression (Vegf and Pparg), along with lower Il-6 expression, higher Il-10 expression, and reduced capsule formation, indicating better biocompatibility.

Conclusions: Cell-assisted AAM transfer is a promising technique for volume retention and tissue regeneration, offering a safe and effective alternative to HA filler injections.

Level Of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

References
1.
Harrison B, Malafa M, Davis K, Rohrich R . The discordant histology of grafted fat: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135(3):542e-555e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000973. View

2.
Dong Z, Peng Z, Chang Q, Zhan W, Zeng Z, Zhang S . The angiogenic and adipogenic modes of adipose tissue after free fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135(3):556e-567e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000965. View

3.
Banyard D, Borad V, Amezcua E, Wirth G, Evans G, Widgerow A . Preparation, Characterization, and Clinical Implications of Human Decellularized Adipose Tissue Extracellular Matrix (hDAM): A Comprehensive Review. Aesthet Surg J. 2015; 36(3):349-57. PMC: 5127478. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjv170. View

4.
Mohiuddin O, Motherwell J, Rogers E, Bratton M, Zhang Q, Wang G . Characterization and Proteomic Analysis of Decellularized Adipose Tissue Hydrogels Derived from Lean and Overweight/Obese Human Donors. Adv Biosyst. 2020; 4(10):e2000124. DOI: 10.1002/adbi.202000124. View

5.
Kochhar A, Wu I, Mohan R, Conde-Green A, Hillel A, Byrne P . A comparison of the rheologic properties of an adipose-derived extracellular matrix biomaterial, lipoaspirate, calcium hydroxylapatite, and cross-linked hyaluronic acid. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014; 16(6):405-9. PMC: 8405149. DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.480. View