» Articles » PMID: 20955723

EU Framework 6 Project: Predictive Toxicology (PredTox)--overview and Outcome

Overview
Specialties Pharmacology
Toxicology
Date 2010 Oct 20
PMID 20955723
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this publication, we report the outcome of the integrated EU Framework 6 PROJECT: Predictive Toxicology (PredTox), including methodological aspects and overall conclusions. Specific details including data analysis and interpretation are reported in separate articles in this issue. The project, partly funded by the EU, was carried out by a consortium of 15 pharmaceutical companies, 2 SMEs, and 3 universities. The effects of 16 test compounds were characterized using conventional toxicological parameters and "omics" technologies. The three major observed toxicities, liver hypertrophy, bile duct necrosis and/or cholestasis, and kidney proximal tubular damage were analyzed in detail. The combined approach of "omics" and conventional toxicology proved a useful tool for mechanistic investigations and the identification of putative biomarkers. In our hands and in combination with histopathological assessment, target organ transcriptomics was the most prolific approach for the generation of mechanistic hypotheses. Proteomics approaches were relatively time-consuming and required careful standardization. NMR-based metabolomics detected metabolite changes accompanying histopathological findings, providing limited additional mechanistic information. Conversely, targeted metabolite profiling with LC/GC-MS was very useful for the investigation of bile duct necrosis/cholestasis. In general, both proteomics and metabolomics were supportive of other findings. Thus, the outcome of this program indicates that "omics" technologies can help toxicologists to make better informed decisions during exploratory toxicological studies. The data support that hypothesis on mode of action and discovery of putative biomarkers are tangible outcomes of integrated "omics" analysis. Qualification of biomarkers remains challenging, in particular in terms of identification, mechanistic anchoring, appropriate specificity, and sensitivity.

Citing Articles

Emerging Bioinformatics Methods and Resources in Drug Toxicology.

Audouze K, Taboureau O Methods Mol Biol. 2022; 2425:133-146.

PMID: 35188631 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_6.


Narrowing the Gap Between and Genetic Profiles by Deconvoluting Toxicogenomic Data .

Liu Y, Jing R, Wen Z, Li M Front Pharmacol. 2020; 10:1489.

PMID: 31992983 PMC: 6964707. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01489.


Literature optimized integration of gene expression for organ-specific evaluation of toxicogenomics datasets.

Taskova K, Fontaine J, Mrowka R, Andrade-Navarro M PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0210467.

PMID: 30640953 PMC: 6331104. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210467.


Transcriptional Responses Reveal Similarities Between Preclinical Rat Liver Testing Systems.

Liu Z, Delavan B, Roberts R, Tong W Front Genet. 2018; 9:74.

PMID: 29616076 PMC: 5870427. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00074.


Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) guidance.

Ball N, Cronin M, Shen J, Blackburn K, Booth E, Bouhifd M ALTEX. 2016; 33(2):149-66.

PMID: 26863606 PMC: 5581000. DOI: 10.14573/altex.1601251.