» Articles » PMID: 26863516

Supporting Read-across Using Biological Data

Overview
Journal ALTEX
Date 2016 Feb 11
PMID 26863516
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Read-across, i.e. filling toxicological data gaps by relating to similar chemicals, for which test data are available, is usually done based on chemical similarity. Besides structure and physico-chemical properties, however, biological similarity based on biological data adds extra strength to this process. In the context of developing Good Read-Across Practice guidance, a number of case studies were evaluated to demonstrate the use of biological data to enrich read-across. In the simplest case, chemically similar substances also show similar test results in relevant in vitro assays. This is a well-established method for the read-across of e.g. genotoxicity assays. Larger datasets of biological and toxicological properties of hundreds and thousands of substances become increasingly available enabling big data approaches in read-across studies. Several case studies using various big data sources are described in this paper. An example is given for the US EPA's ToxCast dataset allowing read-across for high quality uterotrophic assays for estrogenic endocrine disruption. Similarly, an example for REACH registration data enhancing read-across for acute toxicity studies is given. A different approach is taken using omics data to establish biological similarity: Examples are given for stem cell models in vitro and short-term repeated dose studies in rats in vivo to support read-across and category formation. These preliminary biological data-driven read-across studies highlight the road to the new generation of read-across approaches that can be applied in chemical safety assessment.

Citing Articles

Integration of QSAR and NAM in the Read-Across Process for an Effective and Relevant Toxicological Assessment.

Rovida C, Muscarella M, Locatelli M Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2834:89-111.

PMID: 39312161 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4003-6_4.


Unlocking the Potential of Clustering and Classification Approaches: Navigating Supervised and Unsupervised Chemical Similarity.

Mansouri K, Taylor K, Auerbach S, Ferguson S, Frawley R, Hsieh J Environ Health Perspect. 2024; 132(8):85002.

PMID: 39106156 PMC: 11302584. DOI: 10.1289/EHP14001.


New approach methodologies in human regulatory toxicology - Not if, but how and when!.

Schmeisser S, Miccoli A, von Bergen M, Berggren E, Braeuning A, Busch W Environ Int. 2023; 178:108082.

PMID: 37422975 PMC: 10858683. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108082.


Repeat-dose toxicity prediction with Generalized Read-Across (GenRA) using targeted transcriptomic data: A proof-of-concept case study.

Tate T, Wambaugh J, Patlewicz G, Shah I Comput Toxicol. 2023; 19:1-12.

PMID: 37309449 PMC: 10259651. DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2021.100171.


Advancing the science of a read-across framework for evaluation of data-poor chemicals incorporating systematic and new approach methods.

Lizarraga L, Suter G, Lambert J, Patlewicz G, Zhao J, Dean J Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022; 137:105293.

PMID: 36414101 PMC: 11880891. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105293.


References
1.
Abdo A, Salim N . Similarity-based virtual screening with a bayesian inference network. ChemMedChem. 2008; 4(2):210-8. DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200800290. View

2.
Zhang J, Hsieh J, Zhu H . Profiling animal toxicants by automatically mining public bioassay data: a big data approach for computational toxicology. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e99863. PMC: 4064997. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099863. View

3.
Mattingly C, Colby G, Rosenstein M, Forrest Jr J, Boyer J . Promoting comparative molecular studies in environmental health research: an overview of the comparative toxicogenomics database (CTD). Pharmacogenomics J. 2004; 4(1):5-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500225. View

4.
Kleinstreuer N, Judson R, Reif D, Sipes N, Singh A, Chandler K . Environmental impact on vascular development predicted by high-throughput screening. Environ Health Perspect. 2011; 119(11):1596-603. PMC: 3226499. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103412. View

5.
Wu S, Fisher J, Naciff J, Laufersweiler M, Lester C, Daston G . Framework for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as developmental or reproductive toxicants. Chem Res Toxicol. 2013; 26(12):1840-61. DOI: 10.1021/tx400226u. View