» Articles » PMID: 20442865

A Quantitative Model of Transcriptional Regulation Reveals the Influence of Binding Location on Expression

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 May 6
PMID 20442865
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding the mechanistic basis of transcriptional regulation has been a central focus of molecular biology since its inception. New high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments have revealed that most regulatory proteins bind thousands of sites in mammalian genomes. However, the functional significance of these binding sites remains unclear. We present a quantitative model of transcriptional regulation that suggests the contribution of each binding site to tissue-specific gene expression depends strongly on its position relative to the transcription start site. For three cell types, we show that, by considering binding position, it is possible to predict relative expression levels between cell types with an accuracy approaching the level of agreement between different experimental platforms. Our model suggests that, for the transcription factors profiled in these cell types, a regulatory site's influence on expression falls off almost linearly with distance from the transcription start site in a 10 kilobase range. Binding to both evolutionarily conserved and non-conserved sequences contributes significantly to transcriptional regulation. Our approach also reveals the quantitative, tissue-specific role of individual proteins in activating or repressing transcription. These results suggest that regulator binding position plays a previously unappreciated role in influencing expression and blurs the classical distinction between proximal promoter and distal binding events.

Citing Articles

Peak Scores Significantly Depend on the Relationships between Contextual Signals in ChIP-Seq Peaks.

Vishnevsky O, Bocharnikov A, Ignatieva E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(2).

PMID: 38256085 PMC: 10816497. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25021011.


Arid1a regulates cell cycle exit of transit-amplifying cells by inhibiting the Aurka-Cdk1 axis in mouse incisor.

Du J, Jing J, Chen S, Yuan Y, Feng J, Ho T Development. 2021; 148(8).

PMID: 33766930 PMC: 8077510. DOI: 10.1242/dev.198838.


Estrogen Receptor, Inflammatory, and FOXO Transcription Factors Regulate Expression of Myasthenia Gravis-Associated Circulating microRNAs.

Fiorillo A, Heier C, Huang Y, Tully C, Punga T, Punga A Front Immunol. 2020; 11:151.

PMID: 32153563 PMC: 7046803. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00151.


Lessons from eRNAs: understanding transcriptional regulation through the lens of nascent RNAs.

Cardiello J, Sanchez G, Allen M, Dowell R Transcription. 2019; 11(1):3-18.

PMID: 31856658 PMC: 7053884. DOI: 10.1080/21541264.2019.1704128.


Modelling the gene expression and the DNA-binding in the 3T3-L1 differentiating adipocytes.

Ahmed M, Kim D Adipocyte. 2019; 8(1):401-411.

PMID: 31809632 PMC: 6948977. DOI: 10.1080/21623945.2019.1697563.


References
1.
Beer M, Tavazoie S . Predicting gene expression from sequence. Cell. 2004; 117(2):185-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00304-6. View

2.
Loots G, Locksley R, Blankespoor C, Wang Z, Miller W, Rubin E . Identification of a coordinate regulator of interleukins 4, 13, and 5 by cross-species sequence comparisons. Science. 2001; 288(5463):136-40. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5463.136. View

3.
Cermakian N, Reppert S, Sassone-Corsi P . Bimodal regulation of mPeriod promoters by CREB-dependent signaling and CLOCK/BMAL1 activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(11):7728-33. PMC: 124335. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.102075599. View

4.
Maire P, Wuarin J, Schibler U . The role of cis-acting promoter elements in tissue-specific albumin gene expression. Science. 1989; 244(4902):343-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.2711183. View

5.
Welboren W, van Driel M, Janssen-Megens E, van Heeringen S, Sweep F, Span P . ChIP-Seq of ERalpha and RNA polymerase II defines genes differentially responding to ligands. EMBO J. 2009; 28(10):1418-28. PMC: 2688537. DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2009.88. View