» Articles » PMID: 19477979

Predicting Functionality of Protein-DNA Interactions by Integrating Diverse Evidence

Overview
Journal Bioinformatics
Specialty Biology
Date 2009 May 30
PMID 19477979
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-chip) experiments enable capturing physical interactions between regulatory proteins and DNA in vivo. However, measurement of chromatin binding alone is not sufficient to detect regulatory interactions. A detected binding event may not be biologically relevant, or a known regulatory interaction might not be observed under the growth conditions tested so far. To correctly identify physical interactions between transcription factors (TFs) and genes and to determine their regulatory implications under various experimental conditions, we integrated ChIP-chip data with motif binding sites, nucleosome occupancy and mRNA expression datasets within a probabilistic framework. This framework was specifically tailored for the identification of functional and non-functional DNA binding events. Using this, we estimate that only 50% of condition-specific protein-DNA binding in budding yeast is functional. We further investigated the molecular factors determining the functionality of protein-DNA interactions under diverse growth conditions. Our analysis suggests that the functionality of binding is highly condition-specific and highly dependent on the presence of specific cofactors. Hence, the joint analysis of both, functional and non-functional DNA binding, may lend important new insights into transcriptional regulation.

Citing Articles

White-opaque switching in : cell biology, regulation, and function.

Soll D Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2024; 88(2):e0004322.

PMID: 38546228 PMC: 11332339. DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00043-22.


Validating a re-implementation of an algorithm to integrate transcriptome and ChIP-seq data.

Ahmed M, Kim D PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16318.

PMID: 37876906 PMC: 10592348. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16318.


Transcriptome profiling of the Caenorhabditis elegans intestine reveals that ELT-2 negatively and positively regulates intestinal gene expression within the context of a gene regulatory network.

Williams R, King D, Mastroianni I, Hill J, Apenes N, Ramirez G Genetics. 2023; 224(4).

PMID: 37183501 PMC: 10411582. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad088.


Biotinylated Tn5 transposase-mediated CUT&Tag efficiently profiles transcription factor-DNA interactions in plants.

Tao X, Guan X, Hong G, He Y, Li S, Feng S Plant Biotechnol J. 2023; 21(6):1191-1205.

PMID: 36786225 PMC: 10214755. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.14029.


Integrating binding and expression data to predict transcription factors combined function.

Ahmed M, Min D, Kim D BMC Genomics. 2020; 21(1):610.

PMID: 32894066 PMC: 7487729. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-06977-1.


References
1.
Lee T, Rinaldi N, Robert F, Odom D, Bar-Joseph Z, Gerber G . Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 2002; 298(5594):799-804. DOI: 10.1126/science.1075090. View

2.
Estruch F . Stress-controlled transcription factors, stress-induced genes and stress tolerance in budding yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000; 24(4):469-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00551.x. View

3.
Beyer A, Workman C, Hollunder J, Radke D, Moller U, Wilhelm T . Integrated assessment and prediction of transcription factor binding. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006; 2(6):e70. PMC: 1479087. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020070. View

4.
Iyer V, Horak C, Scafe C, Botstein D, Snyder M, Brown P . Genomic binding sites of the yeast cell-cycle transcription factors SBF and MBF. Nature. 2001; 409(6819):533-8. DOI: 10.1038/35054095. View

5.
Boyle E, Weng S, Gollub J, Jin H, Botstein D, Cherry J . GO::TermFinder--open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(18):3710-5. PMC: 3037731. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth456. View