» Articles » PMID: 20440570

Analysis of Biomechanical Changes After Removal of Instrumentation in Lumbar Arthrodesis by Finite Element Analysis

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 May 5
PMID 20440570
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the change in biomechanical milieu following removal of pedicle screws in instrumented single level lumbar arthrodesis. Using a validated finite element (FE) model of the intact lumbar spine (L2-5), two scenarios of L3-4 lumbar fusion were simulated: posterolateral fusion (PLF) at L3-4 using pedicle screws (PLF with pedicle screws; WiP) and L3-4 lumbar posterolateral fusion state after removal of pedicle screws (PLF without pedicle screws; WoP). The WiP model had greater range of motion (ROM) at each adjacent segment than the WoP model. This phenomenon became pronounced at the proximal adjacent segment under flexion moment. Similarly, removal of pedicle screws (the WoP model) relieved the maximal von Mises stress at adjacent segments under 4 moments compared to the WiP model. This study demonstrated that removal of pedicle screws could decrease stiffness of fusion segments, which would reduce the disk stress of adjacent segments.

Citing Articles

Explantation of Pedicle Screws: When, Why, and How?.

Prandzhev V, Vezirska D Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71711.

PMID: 39553108 PMC: 11568824. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71711.


Describing an old trick in posterior thoracal and lumbar ımplant removal surgery: follow-up results for at least 10 years.

Yilmaz M, Ikizoglu E, Ertem O, Arslan M, Erbayraktar S, Yucesoy K Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):384.

PMID: 39054532 PMC: 11271191. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01977-3.


Destruction mechanism of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in frontal impact.

Guo L, Zhang D, Zhang M Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 62(12):3855-3873.

PMID: 39048839 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03167-z.


Risk factors for mechanical complications after fusion extension surgery for lumbar adjacent segment disease.

Kim Y, Ha K, Ahn J, Park H, Chang D, Lim J Eur Spine J. 2023; 33(1):324-331.

PMID: 37558910 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07880-5.


Stress Distribution of Different Pedicle Screw Insertion Techniques Following Single-Segment TLIF: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

Yang S, Sun T, Zhang L, Cong M, Guo A, Liu D Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(4):1153-1164.

PMID: 36855914 PMC: 10102325. DOI: 10.1111/os.13671.


References
1.
Bono C, Khandha A, Vadapalli S, Holekamp S, Goel V, Garfin S . Residual sagittal motion after lumbar fusion: a finite element analysis with implications on radiographic flexion-extension criteria. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(4):417-22. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255201.74795.20. View

2.
Lai P, Chen L, Niu C, Fu T, Chen W . Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(22):2527-32. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144408.02918.20. View

3.
Pintar F, Yoganandan N, Myers T, Elhagediab A, Sances Jr A . Biomechanical properties of human lumbar spine ligaments. J Biomech. 1992; 25(11):1351-6. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90290-h. View

4.
Kim Y . Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(23):2558-68. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cdd8. View

5.
Guan Y, Yoganandan N, Zhang J, Pintar F, Cusick J, Wolfla C . Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006; 44(8):633-41. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-006-0066-9. View