» Articles » PMID: 9431616

1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies. Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Spinal Stenosis: a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Decompressive Laminectomy and Arthrodesis with and Without Spinal Instrumentation

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1998 Feb 12
PMID 9431616
Citations 187
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: This prospective study analyzed the influence of transpedicular instrumented on the operative treatment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.

Objectives: To determine whether the addition of transpedicular instrumented improves the clinical outcome and fusion rate of patients undergoing posterolateral fusion after decompression for spinal stenosis with concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Summary Of Background Data: Decompression is often necessary in the treatment of symptomatic patients who have degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Results of recent studies demonstrated that outcomes are significantly improved if posterolateral arthrodesis is performed at the listhesed level. A meta-analysis of the literature concluded that adjunctive spinal instrumentation for this procedure can enhance the fusion rate, although the effect on clinical outcome remains uncertain.

Methods: Seventy-six patients who had symptomatic spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were prospectively studied. All patients underwent posterior decompression with concomitant posterolateral intertransverse process arthrodesis. The patients were randomized to a segmental transpedicular instrumented or noninstrumented group.

Results: Sixty-seven patients were available for a 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcome was excellent or good in 76% of the patients in whom instrumentation was placed and in 85% of those in whom no instrumentation was placed (P = 0.45). Successful arthrodesis occurred in 82% of the instrumented cases versus 45% of the noninstrumented cases (P = 0.0015). Overall, successful fusion did not influence patient outcome (P = 0.435).

Conclusions: In patients undergoing single-level posterolateral fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis, the use of pedicle screws may lead to a higher fusion rate, but clinical outcome shows no improvement in pain in the back and lower limbs.

Citing Articles

Effect of Lumbar Spinal Stabilization Exercises Along With Neural Tissue Mobilization on Pain and Spinal Dysfunction in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Dhake P, Shinde S, Aphale S Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72396.

PMID: 39583442 PMC: 11586110. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72396.


Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.

Kgomotso E, Hellum C, Fagerland M, Solberg T, Brox J, Storheim K BMJ. 2024; 386:e079771.

PMID: 39111800 PMC: 11304163. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079771.


Spontaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion Following Posterolateral Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 5-Year Data.

Agarwal T, Bhojraj S, Nagad P, Kashikar A, Borde M, Powal G Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(5):598-605.

PMID: 38694687 PMC: 11058144. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01148-w.


Comparison of Fusion Rates among Various Demineralized Bone Matrices in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Lee S, Ham D, Kwon O, Park J, Yoon Y, Kim H Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(2).

PMID: 38399552 PMC: 10890174. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020265.


Impact of Incident Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on 5-Year Postoperative Outcomes and Spinal Alignment Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Taniwaki H, Hoshino M, Kinoshita Y, Matsumura A, Namikawa T, Takahashi S Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024; 8(1):83-90.

PMID: 38343401 PMC: 10853613. DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0160.