Lumbar Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Disease After Arthrodesis and Total Disc Arthroplasty
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Study Design: Systematic review of published incidence of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASDis) after arthrodesis or total disc replacement.
Objective: Assess impact of surgery method and other factors on the incidence of ASDeg and ASDis.
Summary Of Background Data: Twenty-seven articles, none of which were class I or II, met the inclusion criteria. Twenty involved arthrodesis (1732 patients) and 7 involved arthroplasty (758 patients). Nineteen detailed ASDeg and 16 detailed ASDis.
Methods: Data were established for number of patients, gender, average patient age, incidence of ASDeg and ASDis, average time to follow-up, and level and type of surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify which parameters had a significant effect on the incidence of ASDeg and ASDis.
Results: Three hundred fourteen of 926 patients in the arthrodesis group (34%) and 31 out of 313 patients in the total disc replacement group (9%) developed ASDeg. (P < 0.0001) Multivariate logistic regression indicated that higher odds of ASDeg were associated with: older patients (P < 0.001); arthodesis (P = 0.0008); and longer follow-up (P = 0.0025). For ASDis, 173/1216 (14%) arthrodesis patients developed ASDis compared to 7/595 (1%) of arthroplasty patients (P < 0.0001). Using multivariate logistic regression, higher odds of ASDis were seen in studies with fusion (P < 0.0001), higher percentages of male patients (P = 0.0019), and shorter follow-up (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Analysis of the literature suggests a correlation between fusion and the development of ASDeg compared to arthroplasty, but this association is dampened by the influence of patient age. There is a stronger correlation between fusion and ASDis compared to arthroplasty. The data supports only a class C recommendation (lowest tier) for the use of arthroplasty to reduce ASDis and disc degeneration compared to arthrodesis.
Latallade V, Pereira Duarte M, Huespe I, Kido G, Petracchi M, Gruenberg M Global Spine J. 2024; :21925682241309295.
PMID: 39675884 PMC: 11647820. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241309295.
Ha J, Kulkarni S, Kim D, Kim C, Sakhrekar R, Han H Asian Spine J. 2024; 18(4):514-521.
PMID: 39168467 PMC: 11366555. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2024.0066.
Zhao G, Wang L, Wang H, Li C, Yuan S, Sun J Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(10):2499-2508.
PMID: 39118238 PMC: 11456714. DOI: 10.1111/os.14187.
Bashti M, Daftari M, Brusko G, Jamshidi A, Singh E, Boddu J Int J Spine Surg. 2024; 18(3):295-303.
PMID: 38697844 PMC: 11535767. DOI: 10.14444/8599.
Characterization of the Nucleus Pulposus Progenitor Cells via Spatial Transcriptomics.
Chen Y, Zhang L, Shi X, Han J, Chen J, Zhang X Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(18):e2303752.
PMID: 38311573 PMC: 11095158. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202303752.