» Articles » PMID: 15534420

Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion: Review of the Literature

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2004 Nov 10
PMID 15534420
Citations 396
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Review of the literature.

Objectives: Review the definition, etiology, incidence, and risk factors associated with as well as potential treatment options.

Summary Of Background Data: The development of pathology at the mobile segment next to a lumbar or lumbosacral spinal fusion has been termed adjacent segment disease. Initially reported to occur rarely, it is now considered a potential late complication of spinal fusion that can necessitate further surgical intervention and adversely affect outcomes.

Methods: MEDLINE literature search.

Results: The most common abnormal finding at the adjacent segment is disc degeneration. Biomechanical changes consisting of increased intradiscal pressure, increased facet loading, and increased mobility occur after fusion and have been implicated in causing adjacent segment disease. Progressive spinal degeneration with age is also thought to be a major contributor. From a radiographic standpoint, reported incidence during average postoperative follow-up observation ranging from 36 to 369 months varies substantially from 5.2 to 100%. Incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease is lower, however, ranging from 5.2 to 18.5% during 44.8 to 164 months of follow-up observation. The rate of symptomatic adjacent segment disease is higher in patients with transpedicular instrumentation (12.2-18.5%) compared with patients fused with other forms of instrumentation or with no instrumentation (5.2-5.6%). Potential risk factors include instrumentation, fusion length, sagittal malalignment, facet injury, age, and pre-existing degenerative changes.

Conclusion: Biomechanical alterations likely play a primary role in causing adjacent segment disease. Radiographically apparent, asymptomatic adjacent segment disease is common but does not correlate with functional outcomes. Potentially modifiable risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease include fusion without instrumentation, protecting the facet joint of the adjacent segment during placement of pedicle screws,fusion length, and sagittal balance. Surgical management, when indicated, consists of decompression of neural elements and extension of fusion. Outcomes after surgery, however, are modest.

Citing Articles

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis; slippage reduction can be a risk factor for adjacent segment disease.

Saito S, Nakanishi K, Sawada H, Matsumoto K, Oshima M, Uei H Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025; 35(1):110.

PMID: 40072714 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-025-04207-6.


How to prevent preoperative adjacent segment degeneration L5/S1 segment occuring postoperative adjacent segment disease? A retrospective study of risk factor analysis.

Liu Y, Guan H, Yu J, Li N J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):259.

PMID: 40065447 PMC: 11895260. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05439-8.


Dynamic stabilization for unilateral spinal pathologies: clinical efficacy and safety outcomes.

Akgun M, Aydin A, Ucar E, Savasci M, Orak H, Gunerbuyuk C BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):174.

PMID: 39979982 PMC: 11841347. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08097-3.


Biomechanical Evaluation of the Effect of MIS and COS Surgical Techniques on Patients with Spondylolisthesis using a Musculoskeletal Model.

Azizi S, Nikkhoo M, Rostami M, Cheng C J Biomed Phys Eng. 2025; 15(1):49-66.

PMID: 39975524 PMC: 11833159. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2406-1781.


Proximal junctional disease 5 years after surgery for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparing PLIF versus minimally invasive decompression.

Tsujino M, Matsumura A, Ohyama S, Kato M, Namikawa T, Hori Y Eur Spine J. 2025; 34(3):1063-1070.

PMID: 39853356 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08682-7.