» Articles » PMID: 33679922

Biomechanical Effects of Osteoporosis on Adjacent Segments After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study

Overview
Journal Pak J Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Mar 8
PMID 33679922
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the biomechanical effects of osteoporosis on adjacent segments after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

Methods: This study was designed and conducted in the Traumatology and Orthopedics Laboratory, School of Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China, between December 2019 and February 2020. A healthy finite element model of L3-S1 was developed along with one PLIF model and one PLIF with osteoporosis model. Based on a hybrid test method, the inferior surface of S1 was entirely fixed, and a preload of 400N combined with an adjusted moment was imposed on the superior surface of L3 in each model to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. The intradiscal pressure (IDP), shear stress on annulus fibrosus, and the range of motion (ROM) of L3-L4 and L5-S1 were calculated and compared.

Results: In each direction, the highest value of IDP and shear stress on annulus fibrosus at L3-L4 and L5-S1 was found in the PLIF model, and the lowest value in the healthy model. The largest ROM at L4-L5 appeared in the healthy model, and the smallest value in the PLIF model in each direction. At L3-L4 and L5-S1, the highest ROM in most directions was found in the PLIF model, followed by the PLIF with osteoporosis model, and the lowest value in the healthy model.

Conclusions: Osteoporosis can decrease IDP, shear stress on annulus fibrosus, and ROM at adjacent levels, and slow down the development of ASD after PLIF.

Citing Articles

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Influence of Variation in Dental Implant Dimensions (Length and Diameter) on Peri-implant Bone Stress/Strain Distribution: A Systematic Review.

Sayed A, Mohsin S, Garg K, Agwan M, Tareen S, Alruthea M Pak J Med Sci. 2025; 41(1):318-330.

PMID: 39867800 PMC: 11755290. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.41.1.8991.


Risk factors and treatment strategies for adjacent segment disease following spinal fusion (Review).

Huang X, Cai Y, Chen K, Ren Q, Huang B, Wan G Mol Med Rep. 2024; 31(2).

PMID: 39575466 PMC: 11605282. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13398.

References
1.
Park P, Garton H, Gala V, Hoff J, McGillicuddy J . Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(17):1938-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03. View

2.
Yousefzadeh N, Kashfi K, Jeddi S, Ghasemi A . Ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis: a practical guide. EXCLI J. 2020; 19:89-107. PMC: 7003643. DOI: 10.17179/excli2019-1990. View

3.
Tang S, Meng X . Does disc space height of fused segment affect adjacent degeneration in ALIF? A finite element study. Turk Neurosurg. 2011; 21(3):296-303. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.4018-10.0. View

4.
Kim H, Chun H, Moon S, Kang K, Kim H, Park J . Analysis of biomechanical changes after removal of instrumentation in lumbar arthrodesis by finite element analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010; 48(7):703-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0621-2. View

5.
Jiang S, Li W . Biomechanical study of proximal adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and fixation: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1):135. PMC: 6521416. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1150-9. View