» Articles » PMID: 27125545

Inherent Directionality Determines Spatial Release from Masking at the Tympanum in a Vertebrate with Internally Coupled Ears

Overview
Date 2016 Apr 30
PMID 27125545
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In contrast to humans and other mammals, many animals have internally coupled ears that function as inherently directional pressure-gradient receivers. Two important but unanswered questions are to what extent and how do animals with such ears exploit spatial cues in the perceptual analysis of noisy and complex acoustic scenes? This study of Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) investigated how the inherent directionality of internally coupled ears contributes to spatial release from masking. We used laser vibrometry and signal detection theory to determine the threshold signal-to-noise ratio at which the tympanum's response to vocalizations could be reliably detected in noise. Thresholds were determined as a function of signal location, noise location, and signal-noise separation. Vocalizations were broadcast from one of three azimuthal locations: frontal (0 °), to the right (+90 °), and to the left (-90 °). Masking noise was broadcast from each of 12 azimuthal angles around the frog (0 to 330 °, 30 ° separation). Variation in the position of the noise source resulted in, on average, 4 dB of spatial release from masking relative to co-located conditions. However, detection thresholds could be up to 9 dB lower in the "best ear for listening" compared to the other ear. The pattern and magnitude of spatial release from masking were well predicted by the tympanum's inherent directionality. We discuss how the magnitude of masking release observed in the tympanum's response to spatially separated signals and noise relates to that observed in previous behavioral and neurophysiological studies of frog hearing and communication.

Citing Articles

Spatial release from masking in crocodilians.

Thevenet J, Papet L, Campos Z, Greenfield M, Boyer N, Grimault N Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):869.

PMID: 36008592 PMC: 9411511. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03799-7.


How spatial release from masking may fail to function in a highly directional auditory system.

Lee N, Mason A Elife. 2017; 6.

PMID: 28425912 PMC: 5443663. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.20731.


Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Bee M, Christensen-Dalsgaard J Biol Cybern. 2016; 110(4-5):271-290.

PMID: 27730384 PMC: 5107320. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-016-0695-5.

References
1.
Lin W, Feng A . Free-field unmasking response characteristics of frog auditory nerve fibers: comparison with the responses of midbrain auditory neurons. J Comp Physiol A. 2002; 187(9):699-712. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-001-0241-2. View

2.
Lin W, Feng A . GABA is involved in spatial unmasking in the frog auditory midbrain. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(22):8143-51. PMC: 6740497. View

3.
Ho C, Narins P . Directionality of the pressure-difference receiver ears in the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005; 192(4):417-29. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-005-0080-7. View

4.
Holt M, Schusterman R . Spatial release from masking of aerial tones in pinnipeds. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121(2):1219-25. DOI: 10.1121/1.2404929. View

5.
Jorgensen M, Gerhardt H . Directional hearing in the gray tree frog Hyla versicolor: eardrum vibrations and phonotaxis. J Comp Physiol A. 1991; 169(2):177-83. DOI: 10.1007/BF00215864. View