» Articles » PMID: 25352362

Ecology of Acoustic Signalling and the Problem of Masking Interference in Insects

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Oct 30
PMID 25352362
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The efficiency of long-distance acoustic signalling of insects in their natural habitat is constrained in several ways. Acoustic signals are not only subjected to changes imposed by the physical structure of the habitat such as attenuation and degradation but also to masking interference from co-occurring signals of other acoustically communicating species. Masking interference is likely to be a ubiquitous problem in multi-species assemblages, but successful communication in natural environments under noisy conditions suggests powerful strategies to deal with the detection and recognition of relevant signals. In this review we present recent work on the role of the habitat as a driving force in shaping insect signal structures. In the context of acoustic masking interference, we discuss the ecological niche concept and examine the role of acoustic resource partitioning in the temporal, spatial and spectral domains as sender strategies to counter masking. We then examine the efficacy of different receiver strategies: physiological mechanisms such as frequency tuning, spatial release from masking and gain control as useful strategies to counteract acoustic masking. We also review recent work on the effects of anthropogenic noise on insect acoustic communication and the importance of insect sounds as indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem health.

Citing Articles

Road noise exposure over development increases baseline auditory activity and decision-making time in adult crickets.

Etzler E, Ter Hofstede H, Gwynne D, Ratcliffe J Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):280.

PMID: 39987350 PMC: 11846886. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07643-6.


Effective Survey Methods for the Elusive Data Deficient Black Flying Squirrel () in Sabah, Malaysia Facilitate First Vocalisation Record.

Hampshire S, Miard P Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39595375 PMC: 11591083. DOI: 10.3390/ani14223323.


Time and habitat structure shape insect acoustic activity in the Amazon.

Do Nascimento L, Perez-Granados C, Alencar J, Beard K Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1904):20230112.

PMID: 38705178 PMC: 11070253. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0112.


Extensive data engineering to the rescue: building a multi-species katydid detector from unbalanced, atypical training datasets.

Madhusudhana S, Klinck H, Symes L Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1904):20230444.

PMID: 38705172 PMC: 11070257. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0444.


Migratory singers dynamically overlap the signal space of a breeding warbler community.

Sblendorio J, Vonhof M, Gill S Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(2):e11013.

PMID: 38405408 PMC: 10893555. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11013.


References
1.
Romer H, Krusch M . A gain-control mechanism for processing of chorus sounds in the afferent auditory pathway of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol A. 2000; 186(2):181-91. DOI: 10.1007/s003590050018. View

2.
Bermudez-Cuamatzin E, Rios-Chelen A, Gil D, Garcia C . Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird. Biol Lett. 2010; 7(1):36-8. PMC: 3030866. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0437. View

3.
Hoskin C, Higgie M . Speciation via species interactions: the divergence of mating traits within species. Ecol Lett. 2010; 13(4):409-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01448.x. View

4.
Siegert M, Romer H, Hartbauer M . Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation. J Exp Biol. 2013; 216(Pt 24):4655-65. PMC: 3971153. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.089888. View

5.
Pollack G . Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron. J Neurosci. 1988; 8(7):2635-9. PMC: 6569514. View