» Articles » PMID: 1754368

Perceptual Organization and Focused Attention: the Role of Objects and Proximity in Visual Processing

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 1991 Sep 1
PMID 1754368
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The influence of the Gestalt grouping principles of similarity, closure, and proximity on the size of the response-compatibility effect was examined in a focused attention task. In three studies, subjects responded to a centrally located target and attempted to ignore adjacent distractors. The distractors, which served as targets on other trials, could be compatible, incompatible, or neutral with respect to the response of the target. In addition, the distractors and the target could be embedded in the same object, presented in the same color, presented on different objects, or presented in different colors. The typical response-compatibility effect (B. A. Eriksen & C. W. Eriksen, 1974) was found when the target and distractors were embedded in the same object or presented in the same color. Performance was poorer when the target was surrounded by response-incompatible distractors than when it was surrounded by response-compatible distractors. However, the response-compatibility effect was eliminated when the target and distractors were embedded in different objects, even when the distance between the items was less than .25 degrees of visual angle. Furthermore, the response-compatibility effect was of intermediate size when the distractors were not grouped strongly with the target or with neutral flankers. The results are discussed in terms of space- and object-based models of visual attention.

Citing Articles

The effect of object perception on event integration and segregation.

Balta G, Akyurek E Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(7):2424-2437.

PMID: 39294325 PMC: 11480121. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02922-6.


Object-based inhibition of return in three-dimensional space: From simple drawings to real objects.

Qian Q, Zhao J, Zhang H, Yang J, Wang A, Zhang M J Vis. 2023; 23(13):7.

PMID: 37971769 PMC: 10664731. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.13.7.


A Diffusion Model Analysis of Object-Based Selective Attention in the Eriksen Flanker Task.

Kelber P, Gierlich M, Goth J, Jeschke M, Mackenzie I, Mittelstadt V Exp Psychol. 2023; 70(3):155-170.

PMID: 37830767 PMC: 10642289. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000588.


The Impact of Speed-Accuracy Instructions on Spatial Congruency Effects.

Heuer H, Wuhr P J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):49.

PMID: 37636012 PMC: 10453986. DOI: 10.5334/joc.318.


Broad attention uncovers benefits of stimulus uniformity in visual crowding.

Rummens K, Sayim B Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):23976.

PMID: 34907221 PMC: 8671468. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03258-z.


References
1.
Mangun G, Hillyard S . The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Hum Factors. 1987; 29(2):195-211. DOI: 10.1177/001872088702900207. View

2.
Tsal Y, Lavie N . Attending to color and shape: the special role of location in selective visual processing. Percept Psychophys. 1988; 44(1):15-21. DOI: 10.3758/bf03207469. View

3.
Posner M, Snyder C, Davidson B . Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol. 1980; 109(2):160-74. View

4.
Remington R, Pierce L . Moving attention: evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention. Percept Psychophys. 1984; 35(4):393-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206344. View

5.
Duncan J . Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984; 113(4):501-17. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.113.4.501. View