» Articles » PMID: 37636012

The Impact of Speed-Accuracy Instructions on Spatial Congruency Effects

Overview
Journal J Cogn
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Aug 28
PMID 37636012
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In many tasks humans can trade speed against accuracy. This variation of strategy has different consequences for congruency effects in different conflict tasks. Recently, Mittelstädt et al. (2022) suggested that these differences are related to the dynamics of congruency effects as assessed by delta plots. With increasing delta plots in the Eriksen flanker task congruency effects were larger under accuracy set, and with decreasing delta plots in the Simon task they were smaller. Here we tested the hypothesis for a single task, making use of the observation that for the Simon task delta plots decline when the irrelevant feature is presented first, but increase when the relevant feature leads. The differences between congruency effects under speed and accuracy instructions confirmed the hypothesized relation to the slope of delta plots. In fact, for similar delta plots in the compared speed-accuracy conditions, the relation should be a straightforward consequence of the shorter and longer reaction times with speed and accuracy set, respectively. However, when relevant and irrelevant features were presented simultaneously, congruency effects were stronger under speed set at all reaction times. For this condition, a supplementary model-based analysis with an extended leaky, competing accumulator model suggested a stronger and longer-lasting influence of the irrelevant stimulus feature. The congruency effects for reaction times were accompanied by congruency effects for error rates when delta plots were decreasing, but not when they were increasing.

Citing Articles

Different grasping experiences affect mapping effects but not correspondence effects between stimulus size and response location.

Richter M, Wuhr P Psychol Res. 2024; 88(7):2021-2035.

PMID: 38940821 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-01990-5.


Instructed speed and accuracy affect binding.

Selimi S, Moeller B Psychol Res. 2024; 88(4):1203-1211.

PMID: 38337124 PMC: 11142972. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-01927-y.

References
1.
van Wouwe N, van den Wildenberg W, Claassen D, Kanoff K, Bashore T, Wylie S . Speed pressure in conflict situations impedes inhibitory action control in Parkinson's disease. Biol Psychol. 2014; 101:44-60. PMC: 4504191. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.002. View

2.
Kramer A, Jacobson A . Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Percept Psychophys. 1991; 50(3):267-84. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206750. View

3.
Heitz R . The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Front Neurosci. 2014; 8:150. PMC: 4052662. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00150. View

4.
van den Wildenberg W, Wylie S, Forstmann B, Burle B, Hasbroucq T, Ridderinkhof K . To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: a review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010; 4:222. PMC: 3004391. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00222. View

5.
de Jong R, Liang C, Lauber E . Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994; 20(4):731-50. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.4.731. View