» Articles » PMID: 26752732

Interaction Between Object-based Attention and Pertinence Values Shapes the Attentional Priority Map of a Multielement Display

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2016 Jan 12
PMID 26752732
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the perceptual organization of the visual scene constrains the deployment of attention. Here we investigated how the organization of multiple elements into larger configurations alters their attentional weight, depending on the "pertinence" or behavioral importance of the elements' features. We assessed object-based effects on distinct aspects of the attentional priority map: top-down control, reflecting the tendency to encode targets rather than distracters, and the spatial distribution of attention weights across the visual scene, reflecting the tendency to report elements belonging to the same rather than different objects. In 2 experiments participants had to report the letters in briefly presented displays containing 8 letters and digits, in which pairs of characters could be connected with a line. Quantitative estimates of top-down control were obtained using Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention (1990). The spatial distribution of attention weights was assessed using the "paired response index" (PRI), indicating responses for within-object pairs of letters. In Experiment 1, grouping along the task-relevant dimension (targets with targets and distracters with distracters) increased top-down control and enhanced the PRI; in contrast, task-irrelevant grouping (targets with distracters) did not affect performance. In Experiment 2, we disentangled the effect of target-target and distracter-distracter grouping: Pairwise grouping of distracters enhanced top-down control whereas pairwise grouping of targets changed the PRI. We conclude that object-based perceptual representations interact with pertinence values (of the elements' features and location) in the computation of attention weights, thereby creating a widespread pattern of attentional facilitation across the visual scene. (PsycINFO Database Record

Citing Articles

Activity in the Fronto-Parietal and Visual Cortex Is Modulated by Feature-Based Attentional Weighting.

Lanssens A, Mantini D, Op de Beeck H, Gillebert C Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:838683.

PMID: 35546874 PMC: 9082947. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.838683.


TVA-Based Assessment of Visual Attention Using Line-Drawings of Fruits and Vegetables.

Wang T, Gillebert C Front Psychol. 2018; 9:207.

PMID: 29535660 PMC: 5835087. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00207.

References
1.
Shomstein S, Behrmann M . Object-based attention: strength of object representation and attentional guidance. Percept Psychophys. 2008; 70(1):132-44. PMC: 2739629. DOI: 10.3758/pp.70.1.132. View

2.
Kyllingsbaek S . Modeling visual attention. Behav Res Methods. 2006; 38(1):123-33. DOI: 10.3758/bf03192757. View

3.
Baylis G, Driver J . Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors. Percept Psychophys. 1992; 51(2):145-62. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212239. View

4.
Freeman E, Macaluso E, Rees G, Driver J . fMRI correlates of object-based attentional facilitation vs. suppression of irrelevant stimuli, dependent on global grouping and endogenous cueing. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014; 8:12. PMC: 3918649. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00012. View

5.
Duncan J . Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984; 113(4):501-17. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.113.4.501. View