» Articles » PMID: 34907221

Broad Attention Uncovers Benefits of Stimulus Uniformity in Visual Crowding

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Dec 15
PMID 34907221
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Crowding is the interference by surrounding objects (flankers) with target perception. Low target-flanker similarity usually yields weaker crowding than high similarity ('similarity rule') with less interference, e.g., by opposite- than same-contrast polarity flankers. The advantage of low target-flanker similarity has typically been shown with attentional selection of a single target object. Here, we investigated the validity of the similarity rule when broadening attention to multiple objects. In three experiments, we measured identification for crowded letters (Experiment 1), tumbling Ts (Experiment 2), and tilted lines (Experiment 3). Stimuli consisted of three items that were uniform or alternating in contrast polarity and were briefly presented at ten degrees eccentricity. Observers reported all items (full report) or only the left, central, or right item (single-item report). In Experiments 1 and 2, consistent with the similarity rule, single central item performance was superior with opposite- compared to same-contrast polarity flankers. With full report, the similarity rule was inverted: performance was better for uniform compared to alternating stimuli. In Experiment 3, contrast polarity did not affect performance. We demonstrated a reversal of the similarity rule under broadened attention, suggesting that stimulus uniformity benefits crowded object recognition when intentionally directing attention towards all stimulus elements. We propose that key properties of crowding have only limited validity as they may require a-priori differentiation of target and context.

Citing Articles

The radial-tangential anisotropy of numerosity perception.

L-Miao L, Reynvoet B, Sayim B J Vis. 2024; 24(7):15.

PMID: 39046720 PMC: 11271808. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.7.15.


Investigating the crowding effect on letters and symbols in deaf adults.

Kamble V, Buyle M, Crollen V Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16161.

PMID: 38997432 PMC: 11245469. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66832-1.


Attention in redundancy masking.

Yildirim-Keles F, Coates D, Sayim B Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(5):1-14.

PMID: 38750302 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02885-8.


Multidimensional feature interactions in visual crowding: When  configural  cues  eliminate the polarity advantage.

Rummens K, Sayim B J Vis. 2022; 22(6):2.

PMID: 35503508 PMC: 9078080. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.6.2.


Atypical visual field asymmetries in redundancy masking.

Yildirim F, Coates D, Sayim B J Vis. 2022; 22(5):4.

PMID: 35412555 PMC: 9012886. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.5.4.

References
1.
Peirce J, Gray J, Simpson S, Macaskill M, Hochenberger R, Sogo H . PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behav Res Methods. 2019; 51(1):195-203. PMC: 6420413. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y. View

2.
Chen Z, Cave K, Basu D, Suresh S, Wiltshire J . A region complexity effect masquerading as object-based attention. J Vis. 2020; 20(7):24. PMC: 7424119. DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.7.24. View

3.
Harms L, Bundesen C . Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys. 1983; 33(1):11-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205861. View

4.
Coates D, Levi D, Touch P, Sabesan R . Foveal Crowding Resolved. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):9177. PMC: 6004009. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27480-4. View

5.
Scolari M, Kohnen A, Barton B, Awh E . Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?. J Vis. 2008; 7(2):7.1-23. DOI: 10.1167/7.2.7. View