» Articles » PMID: 34131859

Automatic Object-based Spatial Selection Depends on the Distribution of Sustained Attention

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2021 Jun 16
PMID 34131859
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several space-based and object-based attention studies suggest these selection mechanisms may be voluntarily deployed, depending on task parameters and the attentional scope of the observer. Here, we sought to elucidate factors related to involuntary deployment of object-mediated space-based attention through two experiments. Experiment 1 used a modified flanker task where a target and nearby distractor were presented within the same or different object frames, such that an object-based attentional spread should be detrimental to performance. Results showed the presence of a flanker effect with no significant difference in magnitude between grouping conditions, indicating participants may have uniformly used a diffused attentional spotlight regardless of object segmentation. In a second experiment, we manipulated the extent of the observer's sustained attentional scope via an inducer task to determine whether object-based selection depends on the initial spotlight size. The results revealed object-based effects solely when attention narrowly encompassed the target, but not when it was widened to include the distracting flanker. This suggests the deployment of object-based attention may occur when spatial attention is initially focused narrowly. Because selecting the whole object frame directly interfered with task goals, we conclude that object-based attention may not always fully conform to relevant task goals or operate in a goal-oriented manner. We discuss these results in the context of existing literature while proposing a reconciliation of previously inconsistent findings of object-based selection.

References
1.
Lawrence R, Edwards M, Goodhew S . The impact of scaling rather than shaping attention: Changes in the scale of attention using global motion inducers influence both spatial and temporal acuity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020; 46(3):313-323. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000708. View

2.
Eriksen C, Schultz D . Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Percept Psychophys. 1979; 25(4):249-63. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198804. View

3.
Burnett K, DAvossa G, Sapir A . Matching cue size and task properties in exogenous attention. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013; 66(12):2363-75. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.780086. View

4.
Watson S, Kramer A . Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Percept Psychophys. 1999; 61(1):31-49. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211947. View

5.
Shomstein S, Yantis S . Parietal cortex mediates voluntary control of spatial and nonspatial auditory attention. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(2):435-9. PMC: 6674402. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4408-05.2006. View