» Articles » PMID: 16361452

Social Class Inequalities in Perinatal Outcomes: Scotland 1980-2000

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2005 Dec 20
PMID 16361452
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine social class inequalities in adverse perinatal events in Scotland between 1980 and 2000 and how these were influenced by other maternal risk factors.

Design: Population based study using routine maternity discharge data.

Setting: Scotland.

Participants: All women who gave birth to a live singleton baby in Scottish hospitals between 1980 and 2000 (n=1,282,172).

Main Outcome Measures: Low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth, and small for gestational age (SGA).

Results: The distribution of social class changed over time, with the proportion of mothers with undetermined social class increasing from 3.9% in 1980-84 to 14.8% in 1995-2000. The relative index of inequality (RII) decreased during the 1980s for all outcomes. The RII then increased between the early and late 1990s (LBW from 2.09 (95%CI 1.97, 2.22) to 2.43 (2.29, 2.58), preterm from 1.52 (1.44, 1.61) to 1.75 (1.65, 1.86), and SGA from 2.28 (2.14, 2.42) to 2.49 (2.34, 2.66) respectively). Inequalities were greatest in married mothers, mothers aged over 35, mothers taller than 164 cm, and mothers with a parity of one or more. Inequalities were also greater by the end of the 1990s than at the start of the 1980s for women of parity one or more and for mothers who were not married.

Conclusion: Despite decreasing during the 1980s, inequalities in adverse perinatal outcomes increased during the 1990s in all strata defined by maternal characteristics.

Citing Articles

Is the period of austerity in the UK associated with increased rates of adverse birth outcomes?.

Watson R, Walsh D, Scott S, Carruthers J, Fenton L, McCartney G Eur J Public Health. 2024; 34(6):1043-1051.

PMID: 39484738 PMC: 11631487. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae154.


Associations of Preterm Birth with Dental and Gastrointestinal Diseases: Machine Learning Analysis Using National Health Insurance Data.

Song I, Choi E, Kim E, Hwang Y, Lee K, Ahn K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767099 PMC: 9914760. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031732.


Using graphic modelling to identify modifiable mediators of the association between area-based deprivation at birth and offspring unemployment.

Bogie J, Fleming M, Cullen B, Mackay D, Pell J PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0249258.

PMID: 33788869 PMC: 8011734. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249258.


Socioeconomic inequalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the UK and Republic of Ireland: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thomson K, Moffat M, Arisa O, Jesurasa A, Richmond C, Odeniyi A BMJ Open. 2021; 11(3):e042753.

PMID: 33722867 PMC: 7959237. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042753.


An observational study on Ca supplementation and dietary intake during pregnancy on low birth weight and small for gestational age.

Dai W, Deng X, Li L, Qiu J, Mao B, Shao Y Public Health Nutr. 2020; :1-10.

PMID: 33143813 PMC: 11574823. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020004425.


References
1.
Kramer M, Seguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L . Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly?. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000; 14(3):194-210. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00266.x. View

2.
Fairley L . Changing patterns of inequality in birthweight and its determinants: a population-based study, Scotland 1980-2000. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2005; 19(5):342-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00665.x. View

3.
Kaharuza F, Sabroe S, Basso O . Choice and chance: determinants of short interpregnancy intervals in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80(6):532-8. View

4.
Spencer N, Logan S . Social influences on birth weight. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002; 86(1):F6-7. PMC: 1721354. DOI: 10.1136/fn.86.1.f6. View

5.
Bai J, Wong F, Bauman A, Mohsin M . Parity and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186(2):274-8. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.119639. View