» Articles » PMID: 12933774

Social Inequalities in Low Birth Weight in England and Wales: Trends and Implications for Future Population Health

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2003 Aug 23
PMID 12933774
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Objective: To examine social inequalities and trends in low birth weight in England and Wales.

Design: Analysis of routine birth data, comparing (a) couple and sole registered births, and (b) manual and non-manual occupational groups.

Setting: England and Wales, 1993-2000.

Main Results: Social inequalities in low birth weight were evident throughout 1993-2000: relative to the non-manual group, there is an increased risk for the manual group (range in RR 1.22-1.35) and sole registrations (RR 1.51-1.67). An estimated 6.5% (2979 births) of low birth weight in 2000 could have been avoided if risks associated with the manual group were absent, and 2.8% (1290 births) avoided if risks associated with sole registration were absent. Between 1993 and 2000, the low birthweight rate increased significantly with an estimated overall increase of 11%. Increases were evident in all social groups (15% in manual, 11% in sole registrations and 9% in non-manual); however relative to non-manual the increase in RRs were not statistically significant for manual or sole registrations. When multiple births are excluded, the rate of low birth weight is reduced but there is still a significant increase over time and social differentials are undiminished.

Conclusions: There are social inequalities in low birth weight in England and Wales that have not narrowed over an eight year period, 1993-2000. These inequalities are likely to affect childhood and adult health inequalities in the future, hence strategies will need to address differences in low birth weight and further monitoring of trends is therefore desirable.

Citing Articles

Socio-economic differences among low-birthweight infants in Hungary. Results of the Cohort '18 -Growing Up in Hungary birth cohort study.

Szabo L, Boros J PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0291117.

PMID: 37656714 PMC: 10473525. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291117.


Exploring the socioeconomic disparities of maternal body mass index: a national study in France.

Saurel-Cubizolles M, Azria E, Blondel B, Regnault N, Deneux-Tharaux C Eur J Public Health. 2022; 32(4):528-534.

PMID: 35700453 PMC: 9341669. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac064.


Pregnancy loss and Income in the Republic of Korea using National Health Insurance Service Data, 2008-2014.

Lim G, Jung N, Jun K, Kang J, Kim M, Lee H BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):188.

PMID: 35086510 PMC: 8796511. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12588-0.


A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Prevalence of Low Birth Weight Infants in Iran.

Sabbaghchi M, Jalali R, Mohammadi M J Pregnancy. 2020; 2020:3686471.

PMID: 33123383 PMC: 7584963. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3686471.


Prevalence of self-reported mental disorders in pregnancy and associations with adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Mongan D, Lynch J, Hanna D, Shannon C, Hamilton S, Potter C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19(1):412.

PMID: 31703644 PMC: 6842147. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2572-4.


References
1.
Strauss R . Adult functional outcome of those born small for gestational age: twenty-six-year follow-up of the 1970 British Birth Cohort. JAMA. 2000; 283(5):625-32. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.5.625. View

2.
Pattenden S, Dolk H, Vrijheid M . Inequalities in low birth weight: parental social class, area deprivation, and "lone mother" status. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999; 53(6):355-8. PMC: 1756885. DOI: 10.1136/jech.53.6.355. View

3.
Huxley R, Shiell A, Law C . The role of size at birth and postnatal catch-up growth in determining systolic blood pressure: a systematic review of the literature. J Hypertens. 2000; 18(7):815-31. DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200018070-00002. View

4.
Hypponen E, Leon D, Kenward M, Lithell H . Prenatal growth and risk of occlusive and haemorrhagic stroke in Swedish men and women born 1915-29: historical cohort study. BMJ. 2001; 323(7320):1033-4. PMC: 59382. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7320.1033. View

5.
Spencer N, Logan S . Social influences on birth weight. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56(5):326-7. PMC: 1732137. DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.5.326. View