» Articles » PMID: 39484738

Is the Period of Austerity in the UK Associated with Increased Rates of Adverse Birth Outcomes?

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Nov 1
PMID 39484738
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hugely concerning changes to health outcomes have been observed in the UK since the early 2010s, including reductions in life expectancy and widening of inequalities. These have been attributed to UK Government 'austerity' policies which have profoundly affected poorer populations. Studies in mainland Europe have shown associations between austerity and increases in adverse birth outcomes such as low birthweight (LBW). The aim here was to establish whether the period of UK austerity was also associated with higher risks of such outcomes. We analysed all live births in Scotland between 1981 and 2019 (n = 2.3 million), examining outcomes of LBW, preterm birth (PB) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA). Descriptive trend analyses, segmented regression (to identify changes in trends) and logistic regression modelling (to compare risk of outcomes between time periods) were undertaken, stratified by infant sex and quintiles of socioeconomic deprivation. There were marked increases in LBW and PB rates in the austerity period, particularly in the most deprived areas. However, rates of SGA decreased, suggesting prematurity as the main driver of LBW rather than intrauterine growth restriction. The regression analyses confirmed these results: trends in LBW and PB changed within 1-3 years of the period in which austerity was first implemented, and that period was associated with higher risk of such outcomes in adjusted models. The results add to the European evidence base of worsening birth outcomes associated with austerity-related economic adversity. The newly elected UK government needs to understand the causes of these changes, and the future implications for child and adult health.

References
1.
Bruckner T, Lebreton E, Perrone N, Mortensen L, Blondel B . Preterm birth and selection in utero among males following the November 2015 Paris attacks. Int J Epidemiol. 2019; 48(5):1614-1622. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz089. View

2.
Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay C, Cubbin C, Braveman P . Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39(3):263-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.012. View

3.
Sinha R . Chronic stress, drug use, and vulnerability to addiction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1141:105-30. PMC: 2732004. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1441.030. View

4.
Mills M, Rindfuss R, McDonald P, Te Velde E . Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17(6):848-60. PMC: 3529638. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr026. View

5.
Eiriksdottir V, Asgeirsdottir T, Bjarnadottir R, Kaestner R, Cnattingius S, Valdimarsdottir U . Low birth weight, small for gestational age and preterm births before and after the economic collapse in Iceland: a population based cohort study. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e80499. PMC: 3851132. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080499. View