» Articles » PMID: 22700833

Social Inequality and Infant Health in the UK: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2012 Jun 16
PMID 22700833
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the association between area and individual measures of social disadvantage and infant health in the UK.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analyses.

Data Sources: 26 databases and websites, reference lists, experts in the field and hand-searching.

Study Selection: 36 prospective and retrospective observational studies with socioeconomic data and health outcomes for infants in the UK, published from 1994 to May 2011.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: 2 independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the studies and abstracted data. Where possible, study outcomes were reported as ORs for the highest versus the lowest deprivation quintile.

Results: In relation to the highest versus lowest area deprivation quintiles, the odds of adverse birth outcomes were 1.81 (95% CI 1.71 to 1.92) for low birth weight, 1.67 (95% CI 1.42 to 1.96) for premature birth and 1.54 (95% CI 1.39 to 1.72) for stillbirth. For infant mortality rates, the ORs were 1.72 (95% CI 1.37 to 2.15) overall, 1.61 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.39) for neonatal and 2.31 (95% CI 2.03 to 2.64) for post-neonatal mortality. For lowest versus highest social class, the odds were 1.79 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.24) for low birth weight, 1.52 (95% CI 1.44 to 1.61) for overall infant mortality, 1.42 (95% CI 1.33 to1.51) for neonatal and 1.69 (95% CI 1.53 to 1.87) for post-neonatal mortality. There are similar patterns for other infant health outcomes with the possible exception of failure to thrive, where there is no clear association.

Conclusions: This review quantifies the influence of social disadvantage on infant outcomes in the UK. The magnitude of effect is similar across a range of area and individual deprivation measures and birth and mortality outcomes. Further research should explore the factors that are more proximal to mothers and infants, to help throw light on the most appropriate times to provide support and the form(s) that this support should take.

Citing Articles

Mediation of the effect of prenatal maternal smoking on time to natural menopause in daughters by birthweight-for-gestational-age z-score and breastfeeding duration: analysis of two UK birth cohorts born in 1958 and 1970.

Peycheva D, Li L, Fewtrell M, Silverwood R, Hardy R BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):32.

PMID: 39849467 PMC: 11756059. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03556-y.


Risk factors of under-five and infant mortality: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Kefale B, Jancey J, Gebremedhin A, Nyadanu S, Belay D, Pereira G J Glob Health. 2024; 14:04260.

PMID: 39611446 PMC: 11605776. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.04260.


Contribution of ethnicity, area level deprivation and air pollution to paediatric intensive care unit admissions in the United Kingdom 2008-2021.

Mitchell H, Seaton S, Leahy C, Mustafa K, Buckley H, Davis P EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 75:102776.

PMID: 39246717 PMC: 11377131. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102776.


Building Cross-sectoral Collaborations to Address Perinatal Health Inequities: Insights From the Dutch Healthy Pregnancy 4 All-3 Program.

Daalderop L, Barsties L, Steenbergen F, Waelput A, Lagendijk J, Been J Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024; 13:8115.

PMID: 39099488 PMC: 11365078. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.8115.


Health inequalities in childhood diseases: temporal trends in the inter-crisis period.

Carrilero N, Garcia-Altes A Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):76.

PMID: 38632575 PMC: 11025183. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02169-5.


References
1.
Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay C, Cubbin C, Braveman P . Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39(3):263-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.012. View

2.
Emond A, Drewett R, Blair P, Emmett P . Postnatal factors associated with failure to thrive in term infants in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Arch Dis Child. 2006; 92(2):115-9. PMC: 2083322. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.091496. View

3.
McLeroy K, BIBEAU D, Steckler A, Glanz K . An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988; 15(4):351-77. DOI: 10.1177/109019818801500401. View

4.
Wright C, Waterston A, Aynsley-Green A . Effect of deprivation on weight gain in infancy. Acta Paediatr. 1994; 83(4):357-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb18119.x. View

5.
Oakley L, Maconochie N, Doyle P, Dattani N, Moser K . Multivariate analysis of infant death in England and Wales in 2005-06, with focus on socio-economic status and deprivation. Health Stat Q. 2009; (42):22-39. DOI: 10.1057/hsq.2009.15. View