» Articles » PMID: 15867215

Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography As an Outcome Measure for Castrate Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Antimicrotubule Chemotherapy

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2005 May 4
PMID 15867215
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Standard imaging studies are limited as outcome measures for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. We tested the hypothesis that serial fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans can serve as an outcome measure for patients with castrate metastatic prostate cancer treated with antimicrotubule chemotherapy.

Experimental Design: FDG-PET scans were done at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks of treatment. The average maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmaxavg) was measured in up to five lesions and was tested as the quantitative outcome measure. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at 4 weeks and PSA, bone scan, and soft tissue imaging at 12 weeks were considered standard outcome measures. The change in SUVmaxavg that distinguished clinically assessed progression from nonprogression was sought.

Results: Twenty-two PET scans were reviewed and compared with PSA at 4 weeks; 18 PETs were compared at 12 weeks with standard outcome measures. Applying the PSA Working Group Consensus Criteria guideline that a 25% PSA increase constitutes progression to the SUVmaxavg, PET correctly identified the clinical status of 20 of 22 patients (91%) at 4 weeks and 17 of 18 patients at 12 weeks (94%). The accuracy of PET could be further optimized if a >33% increase in PSA and SUVmaxavg were used to define progression.

Conclusion: FDG-PET is promising as an outcome measure in prostate cancer. As a single modality, it can show treatment effects that are usually described by a combination of PSA, bone scintigraphy, and soft tissue imaging. Preliminarily, a >33% increase in SUVmaxavg or the appearance of a new lesion optimally dichotomizes patients as progressors or nonprogressors.

Citing Articles

Glycolytic potential enhanced by blockade of pyruvate influx into mitochondria sensitizes prostate cancer to detection and radiotherapy.

Xu H, Chen J, Cao Z, Chen X, Huang C, Ji J Cancer Biol Med. 2022; 19(9).

PMID: 35972052 PMC: 9500223. DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0638.


PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-IV. Gynecologic and Genitourinary Malignancies.

Salem A, Fine G, Covington M, Koppula B, Wiggins R, Hoffman J Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(12).

PMID: 35740665 PMC: 9220973. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123000.


A review of prostate cancer imaging, positron emission tomography, and radiopharmaceutical-based therapy.

Pawson A, Ghumman Z, Kuo P, Jadvar H, Bartel T, Shayegan B Can Urol Assoc J. 2020; 14(4):130-138.

PMID: 32254013 PMC: 7124170. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6506.


Prospective Study of Serial F-FDG PET and F-Fluoride PET to Predict Time to Skeletal-Related Events, Time to Progression, and Survival in Patients with Bone-Dominant Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Peterson L, OSullivan J, Wu Q, Novakova-Jiresova A, Jenkins I, Lee J J Nucl Med. 2018; 59(12):1823-1830.

PMID: 29748233 PMC: 6278903. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.211102.


Multimodality imaging using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging and F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in local prostate cancer.

Shukla-Dave A, Wassberg C, Pucar D, Schoder H, Goldman D, Mazaheri Y World J Radiol. 2017; 9(3):134-142.

PMID: 28396727 PMC: 5368629. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i3.134.


References
1.
Bubley G, Carducci M, Dahut W, Dawson N, Daliani D, Eisenberger M . Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(11):3461-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3461. View

2.
DAmico A, Moul J, Carroll P, Sun L, Lubeck D, Chen M . Prostate specific antigen doubling time as a surrogate end point for prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Urol. 2004; 172(5 Pt 2):S42-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000141845.99899.12. View

3.
Sanz G, Robles J, Gimenez M, Arocena J, Sanchez D, Rodriguez-Rubio F . Positron emission tomography with 18fluorine-labelled deoxyglucose: utility in localized and advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int. 1999; 84(9):1028-31. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00349.x. View

4.
Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E, Wanders J, Kaplan R, Rubinstein L . New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(3):205-16. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. View

5.
Scher H, Heller G . Clinical states in prostate cancer: toward a dynamic model of disease progression. Urology. 2000; 55(3):323-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00471-9. View