» Articles » PMID: 35740665

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-IV. Gynecologic and Genitourinary Malignancies

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Jun 24
PMID 35740665
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Concurrently acquired positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) is an advanced imaging modality with diverse oncologic applications, including staging, therapeutic assessment, restaging and longitudinal surveillance. This series of six review articles focuses on providing practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use and interpretative strategies of PET-CT for oncologic indications in adult patients. In this fourth article of the series, the more common gynecological and adult genitourinary malignancies encountered in clinical practice are addressed, with an emphasis on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals. The advent of new FDA-approved radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer imaging has revolutionized PET-CT imaging in this important disease, and these are addressed in this report. However, [F]F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) remains the mainstay for PET-CT imaging of gynecologic and many other genitourinary malignancies. This information will serve as a guide for the appropriate role of PET-CT in the clinical management of gynecologic and genitourinary cancer patients for health care professionals caring for adult cancer patients. It also addresses the nuances and provides guidance in the accurate interpretation of FDG PET-CT in gynecological and genitourinary malignancies for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees.

Citing Articles

Investigation of the distribution of inguinal lymph nodes and delineation of the inguinal clinical target volume using F-FDG PET/CT.

Han J, Qi Y, Liu J, Yan X, Zhang W, Yuan L BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1254.

PMID: 39390445 PMC: 11465914. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13015-w.


Incidental endometrial cancer detected on FDG PET/CT imaging for melanoma.

Shagun , Kim A, Koshevarova V, Mohammadinejad P, Murphy M, Bhargava P Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(7):2845-2848.

PMID: 38689809 PMC: 11059307. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.03.058.


Clinical practice in prostate PET imaging.

Huls S, Burkett B, Ehman E, Lowe V, Subramaniam R, Kendi A Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023; 15:17588359231213618.

PMID: 38028142 PMC: 10666681. DOI: 10.1177/17588359231213618.


18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-2-d-glucose PET-CT (FDG PET-CT) in staging of high-risk renal and urothelial bladder cancers (COPPER-T) trial protocol.

Jena R, Bhargava P, Tripathi S, Taywade S, Yadav T, Sandhu A BJUI Compass. 2023; 4(6):662-667.

PMID: 37818027 PMC: 10560619. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.246.


Long Axial Field-of-View PET/CT Could Answer Unmet Needs in Gynecological Cancers.

Triumbari E, Rufini V, Mingels C, Rominger A, Alavi A, Fanfani F Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37173874 PMC: 10177015. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092407.


References
1.
Hoberuck S, Lock S, Winzer R, Zophel K, Froehner M, Fedders D . [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET before and after initial long-term androgen deprivation in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a retrospective single-center study. EJNMMI Res. 2020; 10(1):135. PMC: 7647983. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00723-0. View

2.
Fendler W, Calais J, Eiber M, Flavell R, Mishoe A, Feng F . Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019; 5(6):856-863. PMC: 6567829. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0096. View

3.
Rogers L . Management of Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(1). PMC: 8750777. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010167. View

4.
Oldan J, Sullivan S . Positron emission tomography-computed tomography for inguinal nodes in vulvar cancer. World J Nucl Med. 2018; 17(3):139-144. PMC: 6034544. DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_32_17. View

5.
Gorospe L, Jover-Diaz R, Vicente-Bartulos A . Spectrum of PET-CT pelvic pitfalls in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Abdom Imaging. 2012; 37(6):1041-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-012-9867-5. View