» Articles » PMID: 10550143

Eligibility and Response Guidelines for Phase II Clinical Trials in Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 1999 Nov 5
PMID 10550143
Citations 261
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a glycoprotein that is found almost exclusively in normal and neoplastic prostate cells. For patients with metastatic disease, changes in PSA will often antedate changes in bone scan. Furthermore, many but not all investigators have observed an association between a decline in PSA levels of 50% or greater and survival. Since the majority of phase II clinical trials for patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) have used PSA as a marker, we believed it was important for investigators to agree on definitions and values for a minimum set of parameters for eligibility and PSA declines and to develop a common approach to outcome analysis and reporting. We held a consensus conference with 26 leading investigators in the field of AIPC to define these parameters.

Result: We defined four patient groups: (1) progressive measurable disease, (2) progressive bone metastasis, (3) stable metastases and a rising PSA, and (4) rising PSA and no other evidence of metastatic disease. The purpose of determining the number of patients whose PSA level drops in a phase II trial of AIPC is to guide the selection of agents for further testing and phase III trials. We propose that investigators report at a minimum a PSA decline of at least 50% and this must be confirmed by a second PSA value 4 or more weeks later. Patients may not demonstrate clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression during this time period. Some investigators may want to report additional measures of PSA changes (ie, 75% decline, 90% decline). Response duration and the time to PSA progression may also be important clinical end point.

Conclusion: Through this consensus conference, we believe we have developed practical guidelines for using PSA as a measurement of outcome. Furthermore, the use of common standards is important as we determine which agents should progress to randomized trials which will use survival as an end point.

Citing Articles

Prognostic Value of the Modeled Prostate-Specific Antigen KELIM Confirmation in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Taxanes in FIRSTANA.

Carrot A, Oudard S, Colomban O, Fizazi K, Maillet D, Sartor O JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024; 8:e2300208.

PMID: 38364191 PMC: 10883629. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.23.00208.


Prognostic and predictive analyses of circulating plasma biomarkers in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel/prednisone with or without bevacizumab.

Nixon A, Liu Y, Yang Q, Luo B, Starr M, Brady J Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024; .

PMID: 38347114 PMC: 11317541. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00794-3.


[Guidelines for Evaluating Treatment Response Based on Bone Scan for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial Working Group 3 Recommendations].

Jang J, Lee A, Park K, Kim K, Park H J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023; 84(6):1244-1256.

PMID: 38107684 PMC: 10721425. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2023.0060.


Progression-free survival, disease-free survival and other composite end points in oncology: improved reporting is needed.

Walia A, Tuia J, Prasad V Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023; 20(12):885-895.

PMID: 37828154 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00823-5.


From Concept to Regulatory Drug Approval: Lessons for Theranostics.

Perera M, Morris M J Nucl Med. 2022; 63(12):1793-1801.

PMID: 36456108 PMC: 9730919. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263301.