» Articles » PMID: 26175541

A Phase I/II Study for Analytic Validation of 89Zr-J591 ImmunoPET As a Molecular Imaging Agent for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Purpose: Standard imaging for assessing osseous metastases in advanced prostate cancer remains focused on altered bone metabolism and is inadequate for diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive purposes. We performed a first-in-human phase I/II study of (89)Zr-DFO-huJ591 ((89)Zr-J591) PET/CT immunoscintigraphy to assess performance characteristics for detecting metastases compared with conventional imaging modalities (CIM) and pathology.

Experimental Design: Fifty patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers were injected with 5 mCi of (89)Zr-J591. Whole-body PET/CT scans were obtained, and images were analyzed for tumor visualization. Comparison was made to contemporaneously obtained bone scintigraphy and cross-sectional imaging on a lesion-by-lesion basis and with biopsies of metastatic sites.

Results: Median standardized uptake value for (89)Zr-J591-positive bone lesions (n = 491) was 8.9 and for soft-tissue lesions (n = 90), it was 4.8 (P < 0.00003). (89)Zr-J591 detected 491 osseous sites compared with 339 by MDP and 90 soft-tissue lesions compared with 124 by computed tomography (CT). Compared with all CIMs combined, (89)Zr-J591 detected an additional 99 osseous sites. Forty-six lesions (21 bone and 25 soft tissue) were biopsied in 34 patients; 18 of 19 (89)Zr-J591-positive osseous sites and 14 of 16 (89)Zr-J591-positive soft tissue sites were positive for prostate cancer. The overall accuracy of (89)Zr-J591 was 95.2% (20 of 21) for osseous lesions and 60% (15 of 25) for soft-tissue lesions.

Conclusions: (89)Zr-J591 imaging demonstrated superior targeting of bone lesions relative to CIMs. Targeting soft-tissue lesions was less optimal, although (89)Zr-J591 had similar accuracy as individual CIMs. This study will provide benchmark data for comparing performance of proposed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting agents for prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Advances and challenges in immunoPET methodology.

Mohr P, van Sluis J, Lub-de Hooge M, Lammertsma A, Brouwers A, Tsoumpas C Front Nucl Med. 2024; 4:1360710.

PMID: 39355220 PMC: 11440922. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2024.1360710.


Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Biology and Pathophysiology in Prostate Carcinoma, an Update: Potential Implications for Targeted Imaging and Therapy.

Maes J, Gesquiere S, De Spiegeleer A, Maes A, Van de Wiele C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(17).

PMID: 39273701 PMC: 11396261. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25179755.


A Phase 0 Study to Assess the Biodistribution and Pharmacokinetics of a Radiolabeled Antibody Targeting Human Kallikrein 2 in Participants with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Pandit-Taskar N, ODonoghue J, Chetty D, Max S, Wanik D, Ilovich O J Nucl Med. 2024; 65(7):1051-1056.

PMID: 38782459 PMC: 11218722. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267416.


Comparison of Diagnostic Value between Technetium-Methylene Diphosphate Bone Scan and Technetium-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Scan in Patients with Prostate Cancer with Osseous Metastases.

Alemi M, Banouei F, Ahmadi R Indian J Nucl Med. 2024; 38(4):340-349.

PMID: 38390538 PMC: 10880839. DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_52_23.


[Zr]Zr-PSMA-617 PET/CT characterization of indeterminate [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT findings in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: lesion-based analysis.

Rosar F, Burgard C, Larsen E, Khreish F, Marlowe R, Schaefer-Schuler A Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):27.

PMID: 38389092 PMC: 10885487. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00671-1.


References
1.
Holland J, Divilov V, Bander N, Smith-Jones P, Larson S, Lewis J . 89Zr-DFO-J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo. J Nucl Med. 2010; 51(8):1293-300. PMC: 2998794. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.076174. View

2.
Vosjan M, Perk L, Visser G, Budde M, Jurek P, Kiefer G . Conjugation and radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for PET imaging using the bifunctional chelate p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine. Nat Protoc. 2010; 5(4):739-43. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2010.13. View

3.
Minamimoto R, Uemura H, Sano F, Terao H, Nagashima Y, Yamanaka S . The potential of FDG-PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer in patients with an elevated serum PSA level. Ann Nucl Med. 2010; 25(1):21-7. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-010-0424-4. View

4.
Pandit-Taskar N, ODonoghue J, Beylergil V, Lyashchenko S, Ruan S, Solomon S . ⁸⁹Zr-huJ591 immuno-PET imaging in patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014; 41(11):2093-105. PMC: 4404641. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2830-7. View

5.
Beheshti M, Imamovic L, Broinger G, Vali R, Waldenberger P, Stoiber F . 18F choline PET/CT in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate or high risk of extracapsular disease: a prospective study of 130 patients. Radiology. 2010; 254(3):925-33. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090413. View