» Articles » PMID: 22559390

Sound Level Discrimination by Gray Treefrogs in the Presence and Absence of Chorus-shaped Noise

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2012 May 8
PMID 22559390
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An important aspect of hearing and acoustic communication is the ability to discriminate differences in sound level. Little is known about level discrimination in anuran amphibians (frogs and toads), for which vocal communication in noisy social environments is often critical for reproduction. This study used two-choice phonotaxis tests to investigate the ability of females of Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) to discriminate between two advertisement calls differing only in sound pressure level by 2, 4, or 6 dB. Tests were conducted in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise (73 dB) and using two different ranges of signal levels (73-79 dB and 79-85 dB). Females discriminated between two signals differing by as little as 2-4 dB. In contrast to expectations based on the "near miss to Weber's law" in birds and mammals, level discrimination was slightly better at the lower range of signal amplitudes, a finding consistent with earlier studies of frogs and insects. Realistic levels of background noise simulating a breeding chorus had no discernable effect on discrimination at the sound level differences tested in this study. These results have important implications for studies of auditory masking and signaling behavior in the contexts of anuran hearing and sound communication.

Citing Articles

Neural basis of acoustic species recognition in a cryptic species complex.

Gupta S, Alluri R, Rose G, Bee M J Exp Biol. 2021; 224(23).

PMID: 34796902 PMC: 10658901. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.243405.


Behavioral and neural auditory thresholds in a frog.

Taylor R, Akre K, Wilczynski W, Ryan M Curr Zool. 2019; 65(3):333-341.

PMID: 31263492 PMC: 6595421. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoy089.


Differential effects of sound level and temporal structure of calls on phonotaxis by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor.

Christie K, Schul J, Feng A J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2019; 205(2):223-238.

PMID: 30927060 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-019-01325-5.


Masking release in temporally fluctuating noise depends on comodulation and overall level in Cope's gray treefrog.

Bee M, Velez A J Acoust Soc Am. 2018; 144(4):2354.

PMID: 30404526 PMC: 6199174. DOI: 10.1121/1.5064362.


Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Bee M, Christensen-Dalsgaard J Biol Cybern. 2016; 110(4-5):271-290.

PMID: 27730384 PMC: 5107320. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-016-0695-5.


References
1.
Schwartz , Gerhardt . The neuroethology of frequency preferences in the spring peeper. Anim Behav. 1998; 56(1):55-69. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0737. View

2.
Ratnam R, Feng A . Detection of auditory signals by frog inferior collicular neurons in the presence of spatially separated noise. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80(6):2848-59. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.2848. View

3.
Velez A, Bee M . Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: Signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise. Anim Behav. 2012; 82(6):1319-1327. PMC: 3290330. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.015. View

4.
Bee M . Parallel female preferences for call duration in a diploid ancestor of an allotetraploid treefrog. Anim Behav. 2009; 76(3):845-853. PMC: 2598399. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.029. View

5.
Nityananda V, Bee M . Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs. Hear Res. 2012; 285(1-2):86-97. PMC: 3428025. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.01.003. View