» Articles » PMID: 9210307

The Use of Positive and Negative Reinforcement in the Treatment of Escape-maintained Destructive Behavior

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1997 Jul 1
PMID 9210307
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We identified 3 clients whose destructive behavior was sensitive to negative reinforcement (break from tasks) and positive reinforcement (access to tangible items, attention, or both). In an instructional context, we then evaluated the effects of reinforcing compliance with one, two, or all of these consequences (a break, tangible items, attention) when destructive behavior produced a break and when it did not (escape extinction). For 2 clients, destructive behavior decreased and compliance increased when compliance produced access to tangible items, even though destructive behavior resulted in a break. For 1 client, extinction was necessary to reduce destructive behavior and to increase compliance. Subsequently, when the schedule of reinforcement for compliance was faded for all clients, destructive behavior was lower and fading proceeded more rapidly when compliance produced multiple functional reinforcers (i.e., a break plus tangible items or attention) and destructive behavior was on extinction. The results are discussed in terms of the effects of relative reinforcement value and extinction on concurrent operants.

Citing Articles

Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement.

Shahan T, Sutton G, Van Allsburg J, Avellaneda M, Greer B J Exp Anal Behav. 2024; 121(2):246-258.

PMID: 38329150 PMC: 10979508. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.904.


A comparative effectiveness trial of functional behavioral assessment methods.

Call N, Bernstein A, OBrien M, Schieltz K, Tsami L, Lerman D J Appl Behav Anal. 2023; 57(1):166-183.

PMID: 38049887 PMC: 10843530. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.1045.


Minimizing Escalation by Treating Dangerous Problem Behavior Within an Enhanced Choice Model.

Rajaraman A, Hanley G, Gover H, Staubitz J, Staubitz J, Simcoe K Behav Anal Pract. 2022; 15(1):219-242.

PMID: 35340377 PMC: 8854458. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-020-00548-2.


Applied Quantitative Analysis of Behavior: What It Is, and Why We Care-Introduction to the Special Section.

Jarmolowicz D, Greer B, Killeen P, Huskinson S Perspect Behav Sci. 2022; 44(4):503-516.

PMID: 35098022 PMC: 8738785. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00323-w.


Increasing passive compliance to wearing a facemask in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Lillie M, Harman M, Hurd M, Smalley M J Appl Behav Anal. 2021; 54(2):582-599.

PMID: 33740281 PMC: 8251131. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.829.


References
1.
Zarcone J, Iwata B, Mazaleski J, Smith R . Momentum and extinction effects on self-injurious escape behavior and noncompliance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(4):649-58. PMC: 1297850. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-649. View

2.
Pace G, Ivancic M, Edwards G, Iwata B, Page T . Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985; 18(3):249-55. PMC: 1308015. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. View

3.
Neef N . Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992; 25(3):691-9. PMC: 1279751. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-691. View

4.
Pace G, Ivancic M, Jefferson G . Stimulus fading as treatment for obscenity in a brain-injured adult. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(2):301-5. PMC: 1297806. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-301. View

5.
Carr E, Durand V . Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985; 18(2):111-26. PMC: 1307999. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111. View