» Articles » PMID: 4044458

Assessment of Stimulus Preference and Reinforcer Value with Profoundly Retarded Individuals

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1985 Jan 1
PMID 4044458
Citations 125
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We evaluated a procedure for identifying potential reinforcers with profoundly retarded individuals. In Experiment 1, six persons were repeatedly exposed to 16 stimuli, and approach behaviors to each stimulus were used to identify preferred and nonpreferred stimuli. In Experiment 2, we examined the reinforcing properties of preferred and nonpreferred stimuli by delivering them contingently on the occurrence of arbitrarily selected responses. Results revealed that the preferred stimulus conditions typically produced higher rates of responding than did either the baseline or the nonpreferred stimulus conditions, suggesting that the procedure can be used to assess reinforcer value for individuals with limited behavioral repertoires.

Citing Articles

A Survey of Why and How Clinicians Change Reinforcers during Teaching Sessions.

Morris S, Conine D, Slanzi C, Kronfli F, Etchison H Behav Anal Pract. 2024; 17(3):815-830.

PMID: 39391193 PMC: 11461380. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00847-4.


Relationships between sensory processing patterns and metabolic risk factors among community dwelling people with metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional and correlational research design.

Pomngen I, Sirisatayawong P, Kumsaiyai W, Kaunnil A, Srikhamjak T PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0308421.

PMID: 39241047 PMC: 11379226. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308421.


Stimulus Avoidance Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review.

Hurd A, Brown K, Randall K Perspect Behav Sci. 2024; 47(1):139-166.

PMID: 38660499 PMC: 11035527. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-024-00398-1.


Efficacy of Edible and Leisure Reinforcers with Domestic Dogs.

Lazaro X, Winter J, Fernand J, Cox D, Dorey N Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835679 PMC: 10571986. DOI: 10.3390/ani13193073.


A replication and extension of the augmented competing stimulus assessment.

Frank-Crawford M, P Hagopian L, Schmidt J, Kaur J, Hanlin C, Piersma D J Appl Behav Anal. 2023; 56(4):869-883.

PMID: 37464543 PMC: 10592346. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.1009.


References
1.
Barrett B . Reduction in rate of multiple tics by free operant conditioning methods. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1962; 135:187-95. View

2.
Repp A, Barton L, Brulle A . A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983; 16(4):435-45. PMC: 1307902. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-435. View

3.
Baer D, Wolf M, Risley T . Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968; 1(1):91-7. PMC: 1310980. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. View

4.
Ferrari M, Harris S . The limits and motivating potential of sensory stimuli as reinforcers for autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1981; 14(3):339-43. PMC: 1308219. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-339. View

5.
Rincover A, Newsom C, Lovaas O, Koegel R . Some motivational properties of sensory stimulation in psychotic children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1977; 24(2):312-23. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(77)90009-1. View