» Articles » PMID: 35340377

Minimizing Escalation by Treating Dangerous Problem Behavior Within an Enhanced Choice Model

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 Mar 28
PMID 35340377
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To address dangerous problem behavior exhibited by children while explicitly avoiding physical management procedures, we systematically replicated and extended the skill-based treatment procedures described by Hanley, Jin, Vanselow, and Hanratty (2014) by incorporating an enhanced choice model with three children in an outpatient clinic and two in a specialized public school. In this model, several tactics were simultaneously added to the skill-based treatment package to minimize escalation to dangerous behavior, the most notable of which involved offering children multiple choice-making opportunities, including the ongoing options to (a) participate in treatment involving differential reinforcement, (b) "hang out" with noncontingent access to putative reinforcers, or (c) leave the therapeutic space altogether. Children overwhelmingly chose to participate in treatment, which resulted in the elimination of problem behavior and the acquisition and maintenance of adaptive skills during lengthy, challenging periods of nonreinforcement. Implications for the safe implementation of socially valid treatments for problem behavior are discussed.

Citing Articles

Countercontrol and Associated Challenges in Residential Treatment.

ONeill J, Tacosik J Perspect Behav Sci. 2025; 48(1):145-158.

PMID: 40078360 PMC: 11893962. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-025-00437-5.


On the prevalence and magnitude of resurgence during delay-and-denial tolerance teaching.

Marshall A, Mitteer D, Greer B, Kishel C J Appl Behav Anal. 2024; 58(1):151-163.

PMID: 39660851 PMC: 11803345. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.2930.


Are Function-Based Interventions for Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders Trauma Informed? A Systematic Review.

Pollack M, Lloyd B, Doyle L, Santini M, Crowell G Behav Anal Pract. 2024; 17(3):709-726.

PMID: 39391191 PMC: 11461383. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00893-y.


Centering Autistic Perspectives: Social Acceptability of Goals, Learning Contexts, and Procedures for Young Autistic Children.

Chazin K, Ledford J, Wilson-Moses J, Rajaraman A, Juarez A J Autism Dev Disord. 2024; 55(3):812-831.

PMID: 38367102 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06242-4.


Compassion in Autism Services: A Preliminary Framework for Applied Behavior Analysis.

Rodriguez K, Tarbox J, Tarbox C Behav Anal Pract. 2023; 16(4):1034-1046.

PMID: 38076740 PMC: 10700259. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00816-x.


References
1.
Slaton J, Hanley G . Nature and scope of synthesis in functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018; 51(4):943-973. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.498. View

2.
Herman C, Healy O, Lydon S . An interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis to inform the treatment of challenging behavior in a young child with autism. Dev Neurorehabil. 2018; 21(3):202-207. DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2018.1437839. View

3.
Herscovitch B, Roscoe E, Libby M, Bourret J, Ahearn W . A procedure for identifying precursors to problem behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010; 42(3):697-702. PMC: 2741059. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-697. View

4.
Wilder D, Atwell J, Wine B . The effects of varying levels of treatment integrity on child compliance during treatment with a three-step prompting procedure. J Appl Behav Anal. 2006; 39(3):369-73. PMC: 1702393. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2006.144-05. View

5.
Hanley G . Functional assessment of problem behavior: dispelling myths, overcoming implementation obstacles, and developing new lore. Behav Anal Pract. 2013; 5(1):54-72. PMC: 3546636. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391818. View