» Articles » PMID: 29182009

Systematic Changes in Preference for Schedule-Thinning Arrangements As a Function of Relative Reinforcement Density

Overview
Journal Behav Modif
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 Nov 29
PMID 29182009
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We treated destructive behavior maintained by both social-positive (i.e., access to tangibles) and social-negative (i.e., escape from demands) reinforcement in an individual diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder using functional communication training (FCT). We then thinned the schedule of reinforcement for the tangible function using a multiple schedule (mult FCT) and later thinned the availability of escape using a chained schedule (chain FCT). Both treatments proved effective at maintaining functional communicative responses while decreasing destructive behavior to near-zero levels. In addition, treatment effects maintained when we rapidly thinned mult FCT to the terminal schedule. Throughout chain-FCT schedule thinning, we assessed client preference for each schedule-thinning arrangement (mult FCT or chain FCT) using a concurrent-chains procedure. Client preference reliably shifted from chain FCT to mult FCT as the response requirement increased and the proportion of session spent in reinforcement began to favor mult FCT. We discuss the clinical implications of these findings.

Citing Articles

Relative preference for distinct reinforcers maintaining destructive behavior.

Norris H, Greer B J Appl Behav Anal. 2023; 57(2):358-371.

PMID: 38131231 PMC: 10984786. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.1051.


Using Schedule-Correlated Stimuli During Functional Communication Training to Promote the Rapid Transfer of Treatment Effects.

Greer B, Fisher W, Briggs A, Lichtblau K, Phillips L, Mitteer D Behav Dev Bull. 2019; 24(2):100-119.

PMID: 31749897 PMC: 6867805. DOI: 10.1037/bdb0000085.


A translational evaluation of potential iatrogenic effects of single and combined contingencies during functional analysis.

Retzlaff B, Fisher W, Akers J, Greer B J Appl Behav Anal. 2019; 53(1):67-81.

PMID: 31282005 PMC: 6944780. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.595.


Comparisons of standardized and interview-informed synthesized reinforcement contingencies relative to functional analysis.

Greer B, Mitteer D, Briggs A, Fisher W, Sodawasser A J Appl Behav Anal. 2019; 53(1):82-101.

PMID: 31281974 PMC: 6944778. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.601.

References
1.
Hanley G, Iwata B, Thompson R . Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001; 34(1):17-38. PMC: 1284294. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-17. View

2.
Herrnstein R . Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:267-72. PMC: 1404074. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. View

3.
Reed D, Kaplan B . The matching law: a tutorial for practitioners. Behav Anal Pract. 2012; 4(2):15-24. PMC: 3357095. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391780. View

4.
Roane H, Falcomata T, Fisher W . Applying the behavioral economics principle of unit price to DRO schedule thinning. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007; 40(3):529-34. PMC: 1986697. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-529. View

5.
Bachmeyer M, Piazza C, Fredrick L, Reed G, Rivas K, Kadey H . Functional analysis and treatment of multiply controlled inappropriate mealtime behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010; 42(3):641-58. PMC: 2741064. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-641. View