» Articles » PMID: 8725923

Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1996 Jun 1
PMID 8725923
Citations 122
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: The location of pedicle screws (n = 42) in four human specimens of the lumbar spine and in 30 patients (n = 131 screws) after lumbar spinal fusion was assessed using computed tomography.

Objectives: To determine the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae and the reproducibility and repeatability of the computed tomography examination.

Summary Of Background Data: Failures in the placement of transpedicular screws for lumbar fusion are reported. The evaluation of such screws using computed tomography examination has not been investigated.

Methods: After surgery, the specimens were dissected in transversal slices to observe macroscopically the location of the pedicle screw and to correlate these observations with the computed tomography images. All patients were examined by one observer. To determine the reproducibility and repeatability of the computed tomography examination, two observers studied computed tomography images of 12 patients (n = 58 screws) twice within 3 months.

Results: In the specimens, 10 screws were observed to penetrate the medial wall of the pedicle. This correlated fully with the images. In the patients' group, 40% of all screws penetrated the cortex of the vertebra. Of all screws, 29% penetrated the medial wall of the pedicle. From the computed tomography images, it appeared that a deviation of more than 6 mm medially was a high risk for nerve root damage. Three months after his first examination, Observer 1 documented a different position in three of 58 screws (kappa = 0.90). Observer 2 found a different position in eight screws (kappa = 0.65). The comparison between the reviews of the two observers showed a different opinion for the first evaluation, four disagreements (2-4 mm) and 17 disagreements (0-2 mm; kappa = 0.34), and for the second evaluation, four disagreements (2-4 mm) and 12 disagreements (0-2 mm; kappa = 0.43).

Conclusions: Correct placement of transpedicular screws for spinal fusion seems to be more difficult than it looks. The computed tomography scanning is useful for differential diagnosis of postoperative radicular syndromes after lumbar transpedicular fixation.

Citing Articles

A new method of accurate pedicle screw navigation.

Suter D, Massalimova A, Laux C, Leoty L, Spirig J, Liebmann F Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8615.

PMID: 40075159 PMC: 11904219. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91945-6.


Autonomous Establishment of CT-Independent Sections to Obtain Optimum Pedicle-Screw Axis in Direction, Length, and Safety Margin.

Kumar A, T A D, Bhutani G, Srinivas D Int J Med Robot. 2025; 21(2):e70049.

PMID: 40025863 PMC: 11892341. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.70049.


Risk of neurologic deficit in medially breached pedicle screws assessed by computed tomography: a systematic review.

Mulyadi R, Hutami W, Suganda K, Khalisha D Asian Spine J. 2025; 18(6):903-912.

PMID: 39763360 PMC: 11711176. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2024.0325.


Evaluation of the accuracy of mobile cone-beam computed tomography after spinal instrumentation surgery.

Eom K, Park E, Kim D, Park J, Yoon K J Trauma Inj. 2024; 35(1):12-18.

PMID: 39381521 PMC: 11309363. DOI: 10.20408/jti.2021.0010.


Evaluating the Status and Promising Potential of Robotic Spinal Surgery Systems.

Li X, Chen J, Wang B, Liu X, Jiang S, Li Z Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(11):2620-2632.

PMID: 39300748 PMC: 11541143. DOI: 10.1111/os.14244.